Discussion of article "The Implementation of Automatic Analysis of the Elliott Waves in MQL5" - page 3

[la-vuazie]

Looked at the approximate markup of the impulse figure, the account is wrong, and as a consequence, a possible error to determine the time of the start of work (it is correctable) and a gross error in the direction of work and accordingly the presence of losses (quite painful), and on the example of the eye can doubt that the wave is impulsive.

[MILLL]

Diubakin

Don't embarrass yourself, no need to show your complete illiteracy. Such "cheap tricks ".... Some authors already allow ...." It's laughable. There can only be one answer. They are as much a wave monger as you are.

You should only read, not write. When your 10cm of wave markings, will turn at least, in several kilometres, then only, you can afford any judgments, but so, read and do not write, and you will not be laughed at.

[Arduz]

When will we wait for the corrected indicator with optimised code for small timeframes?

[Sergey Ovchinnikov]

IgorM:

I wanted to see the work of the Expert Advisor according to this article, but no results so far: after launching, the terminal loads the processor at 100% and it is difficult to understand how long to wait, I think that it is necessary to display the progress of TF analysis

SUS: after deleting the Expert Advisor from the chart there are still objects created by the Expert Advisor.

Gentlemen, can anyone help to solve a similar problem, even after deleting the Expert Advisor file and reloading the terminal there are still buttons and I can not remove them from the chart .....

[---]

osn:
Gentlemen, can anyone help to solve a similar problem, even after deleting the Expert Advisor file and reloading the terminal there are still buttons and no way to remove them from the chart....

Ctrl+B

[syaifullah7673]

thank you about elliot wave analysis, but i have any quoetions, 1. How to install it, and 2. can to use analysis in time frame 15M, 1 hour, or 4 hour, 3. what sight if this EA correct and run thank

[Sergey Ovchinnikov]

sergeev:
Ctrl+B

Thank you very much .... but I would also like to know what they are called in English, I am 0 in this language !

[---]

osn:
Thank you very much .... but I would also like to know what they are called in English, I am 0 in this language!

Buttons

[Mykola Demko]

osn:
Thank you very much .... but I would also like to know what they are called in English, I am 0 in this language !

Google Translate

[Sergey Diubakin]

MILLL:

Diubakin

Don't embarrass yourself, no need to show your complete illiteracy. Such "cheap tricks ".... Some authors already allow ...." It's laughable. There can only be one answer. They are as much of a wave monger as you are.

You should only read, not write. When your 10cm of wave markings, will turn at least into several kilometres, then only, you can afford any judgments, but so, read and do not write, and you will not be laughed at.

Judging by your aggressive reaction, you are probably the grandson of Elliott himself))). Thank you for pointing out my place, dear "relative". And I have not asserted anything yet, but only asked why you so categorically deny the possibility of truncation in the wedge. I have given my arguments, and I have seen nothing but emotions from you. About moving "triples" in the wedge, I also think that it is nonsense. And anyway, did Elliott have a wedge, or maybe Preckter invented it? And if you are such a super-professional wave-maker, please recommend who you consider to be an authority among Elliott's followers.