Discussion of interview "Johnpaul77 Signal Providers: "Our Strategy Remains Profitable for More Than Three Years Now. So Why Would We Change It?"" - page 4

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
there's this thing called "jinxing it."
At the Championship that took place earlier, a pattern was noticed -- they interviewed the top man in the race -- and he was no longer in the top of the list of contenders for victory.
Since the topic has been brought up, I'll share my surprisingly accurate prediction:
Since the topic has been brought up, I'll share my surprisingly accurate prediction:
Weren't these guys absolute scamsters?!
They got busted doctoring up fictitious trades.
This signal is fake data made by fake traders, the later months are trading real data, the early days are all fake and dedicated to scamming subscription fees! Too many people fall for it, and in the end too many people burst out of the game.
Looking through the transaction records can always tell a little bit, it's the most direct and effective method, bar none. But often many people ignore this point.
You said this method of identifying fake trading accounts is quite good, I was a beginner, accidentally deceived by the author of this account. Later it was found that he this account is a false trader's own background to do the perfect historical data, in the short period of time after the publication of the real data of the transaction, can not hold on to a few weeks, this account is almost burst out of the game.
I do not know whether the MQL5 platform can be more constraints, that is, only allowed to have a regulatory platform FCA and other formal platforms to publish signals. Otherwise, this MQL5 follow orders website is too much false black platforms to create their own fake trading accounts.