Discussion of article "Grokking market "memory" through differentiation and entropy analysis" - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
For reference:
I'll read the whole thing, thanks. And the links from this article too.
It is interesting, if you plot random increments (well, pseudo-random of course), then visually it is not distinguishable from real graphs. However, their density will also vary randomly. And it seems to be of no use. Although it looks the same :)
added Excel file with working example
It is interesting, if you plot random increments (well, pseudo-random of course), then visually it is not distinguishable from real graphs. However, their density will also vary randomly. And it seems to be of no use. Although it looks the same :)
I checked one of the sequences:
At the end I don't know what you have there - some failure, I haven't analysed it.
But, in general, it is a regular Gaussian random process, without any periodicity in variance and it is quite problematic to win on it, but you can.
The difference with the real BP is simply colossal.
Very interesting, and the joint - a couple of rows at the end of the table should be deleted. I've made the changes.
The difference with the real BP is enormous.
And build an indicator on this difference :)
And build an indicator on this difference :)
Build it :)))))
If only it were so easy, some people here have been struggling with this task for 15(!!!) years.
Someone finds it, of course, and immediately jumps off this forum.
15(!!!) years they have been struggling with this task. Someone finds it, of course, and immediately jumps off this forum.
Hello, nirvana!
I'll read it all, thanks. And the links from this article too.
It is interesting, if you plot random increments (well, pseudo-random of course), then visually it is not distinguishable from real graphs. However, their density will also vary randomly. And it seems to be of no use. Although it looks the same :)
added an Excel file with a working example
you can't tell the difference from the market at all by eye.
Thank you, that's great!
But there are differences in the graphs. The Excel formula produces random increments, and the frequency of occurrence of these increments is about the same. You can visually see that there are a small number of increments of very large magnitude (movement) in the market chart. So, that's how it is :)
Already wrote in the MO topic that this is supposedly done in one go using the inverse Lambert transform
but there is too complicated matrix for me https://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2015/909231/
Although there are packages for R and Py
There is a package in R (LambertW) and it "gaussianises" perfectly. Below are the charts of EURUSD/M20 raw and "gaussianised" logreturn.
Fig.1 Raw logreturn data
Fig.2 Processed data
There is a package in R (LambertW) and it "gaussianises" perfectly. Below are the charts of the EURUSD/M20 logreturn raw and "gaussianised".
Fig.1 Raw logreturn data
Fig.2 Processed data
well, convert back to kotir and then take the fractional returns from the article and you'll get what Alexander is beating on so inconsolably. Idea.
There is a package in R (LambertW) and it "gaussianises" perfectly. Below are the charts of the EURUSD/M20 logreturn raw and "gaussianised".
Fig.1 Raw logreturn data
Fig.2 Processed data
Can you explain why to "gauss" quotes, what advantages it should give, etc., and how to deal with new data? How to work with new "incoming" data using this method?