Discussion of article "Using limit orders instead of Take Profit without changing the EA's original code" - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There is no advantage in using limit orders in DCs. (in terms of slippage) On the stock exchange - you still need to prove it.
Argumentation would be needed.
There is no advantage in using limit orders in DCs. (in terms of slippage) On the stock exchange - you still need to prove it.
I didn't expect this from anyone but you, my colleague. Have you tried to catch and feel the difference in real trading? TP closes a position either at the declared price, or at the best price, or at the worst price. And limit allows you to avoid the last option - negative slippage. But in any case, a normal broker has all these nuances stipulated in the Trading Rules.
What was the test advisor?
The one in the article.
Which is given in the article.
Its work cannot be verified by comparing the final results.
I didn't expect that from anyone but you, my colleague. Have you tried to catch and feel the difference in real trading? TP closes a position either at the declared price, or at the best price, or at the worst price. And limit allows you to avoid the last option - negative slippage. But in any case, a normal broker has all these nuances stipulated in the Trading Rules.
Have you ever traded at a brokerage house? Why is this such a surprise to you? In dts limiters are executed as market orders on ECN type accounts, we do not consider DDE as an obsolete purely kitchen mechanism (although the 1st type accounts are not far behind). There are those who offer additional conditions for setting execution conditions, but usually it is some nonsense and there are few of them.
I am not surprised to hear all this about "normal brokerage companies" from those who have never traded in their lives and have never checked the conditions.
Arguments would be.
I have argued 100 times in different threads of the forum when it comes to execution issues.
as dabbling in arbitrage is primarily related to controlling the execution of ordersI have argued 100 times in different forum threads when it comes to execution issues
as dabbling in arbitrage is primarily related to controlling order execution.DC arbitrage is indeed dabbling. Despite the real (sometimes solid) profit from this type of DC undressing.
DC arbitrage is really a dabble. Despite the real (sometimes solid) withdrawn profit from this type of DC undressing.
It's about checking the trading conditions, that's what I'm saying, that's where the arguments come from.
maybe I'm so unlucky that out of almost 50 brokerage centres I haven't found a single "normal" one :))
It means that "normal" ones are rather an exception.
Maybe I'm so unlucky that out of almost 50 dts I haven't found a single "normal" one :)
So you need only those places where there is arbitrage. That is why you filter "normal" ones even before the execution issues.
So you only want places that have arbitration. That's why you filter the "normal" ones even before the execution issues.
there is arbitrage even in the "largest" ones, for the time being... liquidity providers, so to speak, and the filters are different anyway, and where there is a difference there is arbitrage.