You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Unfortunately, it is very difficult to explain all sides of this process. It would take an article, perhaps. Therefore, it will not be possible to explain it clearly and briefly.
I understand, thank you.
And you don't plan to subscribe to this article thread?
Subject
#903 #903 #904 #12
More on the topic.
And you don't plan to subscribe to this topic of the article?
Maybe agree, through freelancing for 30 dollars, the expert from this post to speed up by 10 times, and post in the same thread.
I don't participate in freelancing and writing articles. Put a request in freelance, that's what it's for.
There is such a trick in the tester on MICEX shares. You get an Ask from the tester, say 12.73. So you set a limit of this size, i.e. 12.73 without any rounding. As a result, the tester rages and does not want to accept the limit, although of course in real life the limit will be set. The funny thing is that at the moment of tick 12.73 the tick size was 0.01, then it was changed upwards to 0.1 and this size is specified in the stock specification.
It would be a good idea to cite the data for reproduction.
Rozumiem, dziękuję.
Czy planujesz subskrybować ten artykuł?
Więcej na ten temat.
Nie dzieje się w freelance i pisaniu artykułów. Oddaj się w podróż tłumaczenia, dla pokoju wziął.
/It would be a good idea to cite reproduction data.
Stock DZRDP date 2015 09 30 for example. And tick histories something like 1331, 1325 etc . Now the tick size is 10 in the spec. So if we try to put a limit with the price of the last Ask in the tester 2015 09 30 nothing will work. That's how I learnt about this problem.
Action DZRDP date 2015 09 30 for example. And history ticks something like 1331, 1325 etc . Now the tick size is 10 in the specification. So if we try to put a limit with the price of the last Ask in the tester 2015 09 30 nothing will work. This is how I learnt about this problem.
The solution to take the minimum TickSize is questionable, because TickValue is tied to it. Most likely, you will have to change both parameters.
Write to SD about the problem.
The solution to take the minimum TickSize is doubtful, because TickValue is tied to it. Most likely, you will have to change both parameters.
Write to SD about the problem.
I think I solved the problem through custom characters. I wrote to SD. Probably they have more important things to do.