Why some great coders and trading system developers are ignoring Metatrader 5? - page 9

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
how can you not know this and at the same time tell us how wonderful MT5 is ? it does nothing for your credibility.
And you are telling me how wonder MT4 strategy tester is :) :)
Seems you are going to catch me on behalf of some group of people? :)
I am not a fish :)
Many traders do not know this "At every-tick modeling, tester pumps all necessary timeframes for the symbol under test independently",
and many traders do not trust it.
Moderators of some forums are banning the members for selling EAs based on backtesting results only (especially MTF EAs).
Because it was a lot of cases when coder coded EA and sold it on internet, EA had different results in trading compare with backtesting, buyers lost money, coder disappeared.
Did you compare backtesting results of some EAs with forward testing results?
I did it for many years with many brokers (MT4). Elite section of some forum was started many years ago only because backtesting results of EAs were different from forward testing results in some cases (I described those cases in some posts above) Before elite section - metatrader yahoo group was started with same situation.
As to MT5 - I am trading manually only for now. But it may be good to compare backtesting with trading on the same way as I did it for MT4.
For example - by taking some EAs (EA coded on close bar, EA coded using icustom, EA coded on close and open bar, EA coded on open as icustom, EA coded on high/low of the bar as icustom, EA coded in MTF way etc) and compare backtesting with trading for same period with same broker ... I did it for MT4 some years ago.
The problem is that this experiment will go to nowhere: people will continue using backtesting results as a proof that their EAs are profitable before selling them, and nothing will be changed in anyway.
I am using strategy tester for MT4 (and MT5) to find possible settings for EAs.
By the way, I used Cloud to optimize the settings for MT5 EA yesterday and it took 10 minues for me instead of 10 hours (because of Cloud).
Yes, Cloud was wonder.
And you are telling me how wonder MT4 strategy tester is :) :)
Seems you are going to catch me on behalf of some group of people? :)
I am not a fish :)
I make my comments on behalf of myself alone, everyone else can speak for themselves. You came here actively promoting MT5, it is up to you therefore to be the expert on what you are promoting and be able to answer the arguments against it. You can't do that without knowing your facts.
When you compared forward tests vs Strategy Testing, how long was your forward testing ? how any currency pairs did you use ?
For how long?
I did it since 2006 for elite section of some forum having 5 dedicated servers trading more than 100 EAs. Some metatrader account was started in 2006 and was continuing till 2012 (forward testing).
Did you compare backtesting results with forward testing for MT4? or you just talking about article as the fact?
I opened this thread to discuss the article (see my first post) - the article uploaded in mql4.
It is my goal here.
As to title of this thread so it is my idea.
And I am trying to use MT5 in most of the cases - my idea too. No one told me (and no one can tell me): "for now - you will be busy with MT5 instead of MT4".
And it is really strange to see how some coders (my friends) are replying to me for my email or to my facebook page, ... and they do not want to go to this mql4 forum to reply ...
IMO, the worst handicap of Metaquotes is no compatibility with past code (MQL4 does not work at all on MT5). It is a very very bad business decision.
I have also developed Apple (Mac, Ipad and Iphone apps) and my applications still work if Apple updates their software. It is a serious company.
For some reason, Metaquotes has decided that the work of their customers has little value. And the price is having no users upgrading to mt5.
I don't use MT5 because I want to use my tools, which are already coded and I don't want to code thousands of lines all over again.
But for a moment, suppose I did all the work again and translated all my code to MT5. Soon enough, MT6 would be released trashing my work again.
So, it is like a vote. And I vote MT4 or having MT4 compatibility.
Well ... this case may be simple one:
and
I mean - EA should be attached to H1 chart for trading and taking the value of some indicators on H4 timeframe.
And we see iTrend indicator ... I spent few years for public developing Brainwashing trading system with some good coders ...
This indicator may show different value for different brokers.
And what about this one?
It is the code from Electra EA
and this one ... it is related to forward testing, right? It is not about backtesting ... As I remember - this EA should be attached to H1 timeframe ....
IMO, the worst handicap of Metaquotes is no compatibility with past code (MQL4 does not work at all on MT5). It is a very very bad business decision.
I have also developed Apple (Mac, Ipad and Iphone apps) and my applications still work if Apple updates their software. It is a serious company.
For some reason, Metaquotes has decided that the work of their customers has little value. And the price is having no users upgrading to mt5.
I don't use MT5 because I want to use my tools, which are already coded and I don't want to code thousands of lines all over again.
But for a moment, suppose I did all the work again and translated all my code to MT5. Soon enough, MT6 would be released trashing my work again.
So, it is like a vote. And I vote MT4 or having MT4 compatibility.
yes, flaab
you are right.
As to me ... as I am not a coder (and I never wanted to be a coder) so some things are not important for me. For example, I can understand something inside mql4 code (as every trader should understand). But I understand nothing inside mql5 code - I can understand just a logic only. So, the distance from "understand something" to "understand nothing" = nothing :) I was talking about mql4 and mql5 programming language - if I am not a coder so ...
I like MT5 because of many things (I described it on this thread).
But main my concern is the following: I need to convert all my tools to mql5 programming language.
Yes, I started to do it (it takes money) ... but I am sorry - if it is my tool so why should I send them to any coder with a question "please convert it for ... credits"?
I want to keep it for myself ... I do not want to send it to any coder (with money) :)
But to keep it for myself - I will have to learn mql5 ...
Do you see my image on this page https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/142858/page5 (image with white background)?
This is AccountAnalyzer_v1.1 indicator making this stats from account history.
How can I convert it to MT5 if I do not want to disclose this tool?
No way ... I will have to learn mql5 language anyway ...
I was reading some threads or article that someone proposed to have some MT4 emulator on MT5 ... so I have no idea - it is true or not.
For how long?
I did it since 2006 for elite section of some forum having 5 dedicated servers trading more than 100 EAs.
I was asking how long did you test an EA for on a forward test compared to the same EA tested with the same settings and comparable spread on a Strategy Tester test ? So how long on the ST ? how long on a forward test ?
I have not tested any EAs seriously on a forward test, I don't have anything that is worth the effort yet.
And it is really strange to see how some coders (my friends) are replying to me for my email or to my facebook page, ... and they do not want to go to this mql4 forum to reply ...
Well ... this case may be simple one:
and
I mean - EA should be attached to H1 chart for trading and taking the value of some indicators on H4 timeframe.
And we see iTrend indicator ... I spent few years for public developing Brainwashing trading system with some good coders ...
This indicator may show different value for different brokers.