Discussion of article "Creating Neural Network EAs Using MQL5 Wizard and Hlaiman EA Generator" - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Well firstly, if you are a grated neural networker, the article should reflect the idea that backtesting is evil and describe the right way to test.
Secondly, there should be something more substantial in the signals than the demo from the MC. And even for the demo, there are doubts about its relation to your oscillator.
I don't like being sold junk.I want to find debtors and love, I understand you :).
And on the topic, pay attention to how clearly profitability decreases in the test signal, because you, as a "well-trained neural networkist", probably know that one of the main tasks of forward testing is to determine the dynamics of market changes, as well as the parameters and frequency of retraining of the neural network.
.
One of the main tasks of forward testing is to determine the dynamics of market changes, as well as the parameters and periodicity of retraining of the neural network.
) I don't see the point in talking about anything further.
And don't manipulate.
) I don't see the point in talking about anything further.
And don't manipulate.
I agree - no more flud and manipulation, I will try to respond only to adequate posts.
) I don't see the point in talking about anything further.
And there was nothing to talk about here from the beginning.
is some scrappy reference about "look at the exe I made". the article is worthless.
Of course, the afftar warned everyone at once and sent them to "many other sources" so that people like you, Andrei, could safely shut their mouths, saying that the article is not about networks and tests, but about how to use my exe.
Taking into account that he wants 300 greenbacks for this trinket, it causes mixed feelings of annoyance for wasted time on reading and getting acquainted with the software (which he tries to position as a social one, it means probably... fashion such),
especially after collecting information "During the first run of the script you will be asked to enter registration data, enter your email address", well, like to become more social and more useful.
In general for the article -1, safely in the trash.
and there was nothing to talk about here from the beginning.
is some scrappy reference about "look at the exe I made". the article is worthless.
Of course, the afftar warned everyone at once and sent them to "many other sources" so that people like you, Andrei, could shut their mouths, saying that the article is not about networks and tests, but about how to use my exe.
Taking into account that he wants 300 greenbacks for this trinket, it causes mixed feelings of annoyance for wasted time on reading and getting acquainted with the software (which he tries to position as a social one, it means probably... fashion such),
especially after collecting information"During the first run of the script you will be asked to enter registration data, enter your email address", well, like to become more social and more useful.
At this point I stopped installing the demo version, which I had downloaded.
I will tell you a secret that your fears are actually somewhat exaggerated, as the address you enter during registration is not used anywhere and, accordingly, is not even checked for validity.
as a "seasoned neural networker", you probably know that one of the main tasks of forward testing is to determine the dynamics of market changes, as well as the parameters and periodicity of retraining of a neural network.
.
It's easy to build a bunch of neural networks, and it's easy to show how profitable they are on a backtest. But the forward test is needed to determine how these networks will behave on untrained data. The dynamics of market changes and the frequency of retraining networks have nothing to do with it. Retrain the network at every new tick, it will not help profitability in real trading, but how to create such a network that would sustainably bring profit on new data is the most important thing. And the signals on the pipswitcher do not confirm anything. There are plenty of profitable demo pipers without neural networks.
I see Renat in his tone: well, people have gone, we give them tools for creating networks, and they demand that networks earn money. Some bums! They want everything for free! But nobody wants to buy a tool and change it to create profitable networks.
Neural network is a mechanism, a tool that has been evaluated for its cost. Thinking the price is adequate if everything works as it should).
A neural network is a mechanism, a tool
A hammer is also a tool, but you can't split an atom with it. It's not that simple.
sometimes it's enough to read the comments to an article to.... not to waste time on the article itself.
thanks to the commenters. :) and, all the same, thanks to the afftar for his labour, thanks to MQ for the money spent on the afftar's labour. in short, "peace, labour, may!".