
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
As said before, the answer to Tony's poll is too simple! An unknown remains an unknown until its an outcome... Statistics 101.
geekbot 2013.06.06 07:02 #
As said before, the answer to Tony's poll is too simple! An unknown remains an unknown until its an outcome... Statistics 101.
Guarantee from past performance perhaps
from past performance?... unless the guarantor purchased a government bond with that payment or something more certain, it would be too risky!...
So if its just a simple fx signal then first of all draw-down needs to be managed well in the short run. The reason most would prefer the smaller payments is you get to know soon enough whether the signal is credible so from that angle, it is less risky.
from past performance?... unless the guarantor purchased a government bond with that payment or something more certain, it would be too risky!...
So if its just a simple fx signal then first of all draw-down needs to be managed well in the short run. The reason most would prefer the smaller payments is you get to know soon enough whether the signal is credible so from that angle, it is less risky.
I think it was inferred... If the small payments are all coming in the last year then as geekbot implied their NPV would be much less than the large future payment.