Discussion of article "The algorithm of ticks’ generation within the strategy tester of the MetaTrader 5 terminal" - page 9
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I don't expect anything but sarcasm from people who are completely far from programming on this forum. Keep trading manually.
Labelling everyone ... at least you could go through the forum a little, read... those who can not program and have not even heard of ATS )) all fans of manual trading )). Just great...
H.Y. And there was no sarcasm there. It was a good wish. You can - do it...
These days, with spaceships ploughing the vastness of the universe,...
If the question is worth money, everything can be realised. And collecting ticks the way you need and even five times better, and testing strategies on tick streams, and organising trading, taking into account all discrepancies between testing conditions and real work.
Who is ready to act as a general and maybe exclusive customer?
Labelling everyone ... at least a little bit on the forum, read ... here are gathered exactly those who do not know how to programme and have not even heard of ATS )) all fans of manual trading )) Just great...
H.Y. And there was no sarcasm there. It was a good wish. You can - do it...
Sergey, there are only a few professional programmers who understand the topic here. And maybe you shouldn't run away into the bushes, crunching branches loudly, from an offer of professional help. P.S. If you think here is a forum of PBX programmers, you are deeply mistaken.
The reference "make and sell" except for sarcasm is difficult to perceive. I am not suggesting you to sell your system, we are not making EAs for sale at $5, our goals are a bit different.
Even if MQ implement their tick stream and testing on it, their implementation will still be insufficient, and they will not make a complete toolkit, there are objective reasons for that. There will be no happiness on this path. There will only be some improvement. And they have already answered clearly, there will be no work with real tick flow.
Therefore, we either use what we have, or I have such a proposal. I am not going to move in this direction independently and proactively, because I have my own topics to work on. But it would be interesting as an executor.
gip, he is an outright theorist, far from assessing the practical (implementation, conditions, cost, technical characteristics and consequences of mass application) side of the matter.
His practical side ends with "...do it and you will become rich...".
gip, he is an outright theorist, far from assessing the practical (implementation, conditions, cost, technical characteristics and consequences of mass application) side of the matter.
His practical side ends with "...do it and you will become rich...".
In this thread we are talking about something that has been realised for a long time. You should at least look at your competitors sometimes. Otherwise you only declare that tics is suicide (other companies have done it), you can't make a graph without holes, and ASC is just a patch nobody needs. Just to get off your backs.
Here put the programme and study it, if you can't (can't or don't want to) learn how it is necessary..... everything described above is available and practically implemented + forex stack...
http://w ww.dukascopy.com/swiss/russian/forex/jforex/
Z.y. Theoretician... I was a theorist about 4 years ago, when I convinced you that history should be tick-based. But it's still there. If you had made the right decision then, yes, exactly theoretically correct, this thread would not exist....
Sergey, there are only a few professional programmers who understand the topic here. And maybe you should not run away into the bushes, crunching branches loudly, from the offer of professional help. P.S. If you think this is a forum of PBX programmers, you are deeply mistaken.
...
I have never refused professional help. But I don't need it on the basis of MT. I see and understand its capabilities perfectly well. But I will not refuse help for writing progs for the platform (link above), there is another one and it is also great...
Here's a chart with no holes in it.
You have misconceptions about price charts. And about the role of ticks. And you have to start by defining what a tick is.
Enlighten me. Maybe we really don't understand each other here...
Just please, so that we talk and understand each other, read the textbook, I made you a selection that would be more convenient and faster from the MQL textbook.
here about tick https://book.mql4.com/ru/basics/common
this is a glossary of terms https://book.mql4.com/ru/appendix/glossary
Well, here is where the holes come from https://www.mql5.com/ru/articles/1407.
H.Y. I understand perfectly well that MQL will not do anything and I am fighting against windmills. The platform is already made, the history is only minute, the holes are and will be. And the developers are powerless to change anything, the championship is upon us, and the platform needs to be sold, the costs are high, it's time to pay them off. The decision made 3-4 years ago that the story will be in this form (minutes), now knits them in their hands, and they are powerless to change anything. Maybe sometime later, when they are thinking about MQL6, they will remember this thread. And still agree that bars consist of ticks, having tick history, you can build different types of bars (charts) - it will enrich the trading platform and give traders new interesting methods of analysis.
H.Z.Y. The only mystery for me is the bar's spread , it is not clear how it is calculated. We all know very well that the spread is floating and can change within a minute. How it is calculated is unclear... why many bars have no spread in the history (that there was no ask at all ?...nonsense). But the most surprising thing is that the tester perfectly manages without this information... it doesn't care what spread there was in the history.....
Prival, please watch your speech.
Don't forget that we go through all this in practice and implement it, and you are jumping into the bushes when trying to transfer the conversation to the real rails of implementation. Your thoughts about playing in tick noise and analysing it are complete nonsense.
Besides, you don't shy away from blatantly lying in public statements on technical issues, apparently reserving the right to say "oh, I/you must have misunderstood/and". Your "mistakes" completely discredit those rare moments of correct theoretical research that you make here.
Prival, please watch your speech.
Don't forget that we go through all this in practice and implement it, and you are jumping into the bushes when trying to transfer the conversation to the real rails of implementation. Your thoughts about playing in tick noise and analysing it are complete nonsense.
Besides, you do not shy away from blatantly lying in public statements on technical issues, apparently reserving the right to say "oh, I must have misunderstood". Your "mistakes" completely discredit those rare moments of correct theoretical research that you make here.
And I will ask you to watch your speech
1. where and in what I lied ?
2. there are indicators above, anyone can download them and check if there are bars without aska..... and you are silent ... who is CLEARLY LYING the question.
3. About holes ... so everyone knows about it for a long time.
H.Y. not to understand that the basis of any kind of charts are ticks ... I understand if I would explain it to a first grader, but to an experienced TP developer ...