Scylla AI
279 USD
Demo heruntergeladen:
539
Veröffentlicht:
9 April 2025
Aktuelle Version:
3.61
Keinen passenden Roboter gefunden?
Geben Sie Ihren Eigenen in Auftrag
auf Freelance!
Gehen Sie zu Freelance
Geben Sie Ihren Eigenen in Auftrag
auf Freelance!
Wie man einen Roboter oder Indikator kaufen kann
Starte Deinen EA im
Virtual Hosting
Virtual Hosting
Teste einen Indikator/Roboter vor dem Kauf
Möchtest Du Geld im Market verdienen?
Wie man Produkte richtig präsentiert
Sie verpassen Handelsmöglichkeiten:
- Freie Handelsapplikationen
- Über 8.000 Signale zum Kopieren
- Wirtschaftsnachrichten für die Lage an den Finanzmärkte
Registrierung
Einloggen
Sie stimmen der Website-Richtlinie und den Nutzungsbedingungen zu.
Wenn Sie kein Benutzerkonto haben, registrieren Sie sich
On the reasoning vs. non-reasoning AI choices: The reasoning models (like grok-4-1-fast-reasoning or grok-4-fast-reasoning) have the AI break down its market analysis step by step—evaluating indicators, trends, and risks in a logical chain. This leads to more nuanced, context-aware trade signals, but it can take a tad longer and use more tokens for deeper insights. Non-reasoning ones (grok-4-1-fast-non-reasoning or grok-4-fast-non-reasoning) skip that internal monologue for quicker, straightforward outputs based on patterns—faster execution, but potentially less refined predictions in choppy markets.
I designed it that way to balance speed and smarts; start with the default reasoning for Forex majors, but switch to non-reasoning if you're trading high-vol pairs and need snappier responses. Tweak the AI temperature down to 0.1 for tighter precision if results feel off. Let me know how it goes!
Hallo, ich habe die Software gekauft. Könnten Sie mir bitte die optimalen Einstellungen zukommen lassen?
Key ones I'd tweak for balanced performance:
- RISK_PERCENT: Stick to 1.0% for steady growth without big swings—it's what I use personally.
- USE_AUTO_LOT: True, so it scales lots smartly with your balance.
- MAX_OPEN_ORDERS: 4 max, to avoid overexposure.
- AI side: Keep SelectedModel as grok-4-1-fast-reasoning (my favorite for quick, insightful analysis), AI_TEMPERATURE at 0.2 for precision, and displayrepot true to see the magic on your charts.
- News filter: USEFILTERNEWS true, BeforeNewsStop 120, AfterNewsStop 60, NewsHard true—these have saved my backtests from news bombs plenty of times.
- Trailing: USE_TRAILING_STOP true, TRAILING_TRIGGER 5 pips, TRAILING_DISTANCE 3—keeps profits locked without being too tight.
- Trading hours: 09:00 to 17:00 during your session, and ENABLE_FRIDAY_PROTECTION true to chill on weekends.
- Volatility: ENABLE_VOLATILITY_PROTECTION true, MAX_VOLUME_MULTIPLIER 4.0.
Start there, monitor the Experts tab for AI reports, and adjust based on your backtests. If you hit snags, hit me up via MQL5—happy trading!
Hello everyone,
I have been actively testing the Scylla AI bot on my own account with the XAUUSD (Gold) pair and 1% risk setting for a while now. I wanted to write an objective review based on "live data" from the field for anyone in the forum or community who is curious about this bot or considering purchasing it.
First of all, I need to give credit where it is due regarding one specific aspect: The creator/seller of the bot is genuinely very involved. Unlike many sellers in this market who disappear after the sale, he answered every single one of my questions, helped with the technical setup, and is sincerely trying to achieve something good. I would like to thank him publicly for his efforts and attention. Personally, I give him full marks for support.
However... Let's get to the main issue: The bot's performance and the losses I experienced.
Unfortunately, the quality of the seller is not reflected in the bot's strategy. Let me explain the process I went through and why I decided to stop the bot, using specific points and numbers:
1. The Risk/Reward (R:R) Imbalance: The biggest handicap of the bot is its Risk/Reward ratio. When I look at my trading history, I see a clear imbalance:
When the bot wins, it usually closes with small profits (TP) between $3 and $5.
However, when the trade goes against it, it acts very stubbornly and waits until it hits a stop loss of -$15 to -$20.
The Mathematical Reality: Once a stop loss is hit (which happens frequently since XAUUSD is volatile), the bot needs to win 4-5 consecutive transactions without error just to recover that single loss. This is not a sustainable cycle.
2. False Hope and Sharp Drawdowns: Towards the end of November, I experienced a "false spring" where the bot worked very well and brought in consecutive profits of around +$20. I got hopeful, thinking, "Okay, the system has settled." However, as soon as the market character changed at the beginning of December, the bot could not adapt.
Just looking at the transactions on December 8th, it wiped out most of those previous gains and a portion of the main capital in a very short time with consecutive losses like -$10, -$10, -$12.
The intervening trades that closed with profits like +$0.44 or +$1.12 probably barely covered the swap/commission costs.
3. Conclusion: The bot remains weak in trend following and is too late to cut losses when caught on the wrong side of the trade. No matter how concerned the seller is, at the end of the day, if the balance on my screen is melting, the system needs revision.
Summary: You can be at ease regarding support and communication; you will definitely find a respondent. However, with its current strategy (wide Stop Loss levels and tight Take Profit levels), this bot carries a high risk of slowly eroding your capital in a "choppy" market condition. I recommend that friends considering this investment take this R:R (Risk/Reward) imbalance into account.
Wishing everyone profitable trades.
I also updated to version 3.61, but after the update I experienced a phenomenon where the lot size became larger.
I decided to adjust the settings as shown below and observe the behavior:
Use AI → grok-4-1-fast-reasoning
USE_AUTO_LOT → False (0.01)
Trailing: USE_TRAILING_STOP → True
TRAILING_TRIGGER → 5 pips
TRAILING_DISTANCE → 3
I set the AI temperature to 0.1 and fixed the lot size to 0.01 to prevent martingale trading, adjusting the settings as much as possible to reduce risk.
However, I ended up with the same results as the previous poster: large losses and very small profits.
Although I only observed it for one day, I tested it on four currency pairs.
The previous day, I monitored it using an account where a zero-spread commission is charged, but the commissions were higher than the profits, and as expected, the account balance decreased.
I also updated to version 3.61, but after the update I experienced a phenomenon where the lot size became larger.
I decided to adjust the settings as shown below and observe the behavior:
Use AI → grok-4-1-fast-reasoning
USE_AUTO_LOT → False (0.01)
Trailing: USE_TRAILING_STOP → True
TRAILING_TRIGGER → 5 pips
TRAILING_DISTANCE → 3
I set the AI temperature to 0.1 and fixed the lot size to 0.01 to prevent martingale trading, adjusting the settings as much as possible to reduce risk.
However, I ended up with the same results as the previous poster: large losses and very small profits.
Although I only observed it for one day, I tested it on four currency pairs.
The previous day, I monitored it using an account where a zero-spread commission is charged, but the commissions were higher than the profits, and as expected, the account balance decreased.
90
55
I also updated to version 3.61, but after the update I experienced a phenomenon where the lot size became larger.
I decided to adjust the settings as shown below and observe the behavior:
Use AI → grok-4-1-fast-reasoning
USE_AUTO_LOT → False (0.01)
Trailing: USE_TRAILING_STOP → True
TRAILING_TRIGGER → 5 pips
TRAILING_DISTANCE → 3
I set the AI temperature to 0.1 and fixed the lot size to 0.01 to prevent martingale trading, adjusting the settings as much as possible to reduce risk.
However, I ended up with the same results as the previous poster: large losses and very small profits.
Although I only observed it for one day, I tested it on four currency pairs.
The previous day, I monitored it using an account where a zero-spread commission is charged, but the commissions were higher than the profits, and as expected, the account balance decreased.
Please share the results of the changes with us.
変更の結果をぜひ私たちと共有してください。
Please share the results of the changes with us.
Since purchasing on 11/27, everything has been at a loss.
Is my setup wrong? Honestly, it’s really tough.
Is anyone else going through the same situation?
Since purchasing on 11/27, everything has been at a loss.
Is my setup wrong? Honestly, it’s really tough.
Is anyone else going through the same situation?
In reality, …
昨日12月1日からGrokへの接続が機能しなくなりました。エラーコードは429と401です。
認証失敗（401ステータス）・レート制限（429ステータス）
APIの使用が不可能な状態を指します。
解決するには、APIキーの提供者である開発者に伝えるか、または自分で用意する必要があります。
この問題は購入者全員が遭遇していると思います。