Nur Nutzer, die das Produkt gekauft oder gemietet haben, können Kommentare hinterlassen
Mohit Dhariwal  

Channel Tpl for this indicator channel is provided here. Happy trading

For any queries connect me in inbox and telegram @anabullbear

Dateien:
channel.tpl  2 kb
Brettfau77  

Hi Mohit,

I just purchased your indicator, could you please send me the channel indicator along with the set files and EA as you mentioned.


Thanks,

Brett

Mohit Dhariwal  
Brettfau77 #:

Hi Mohit,

I just purchased your indicator, could you please send me the channel indicator along with the set files and EA as you mentioned.


Thanks,

Brett

I have sent the ea and channel with the best set file to be used on m15 .for any queries kindly connect in inbox or telegram @anabullbear

CrudeOil Best Strategy  
Let me tell you straight: that setup is broken. And I'm not being insulting—I'm being mathematical.

225 / 190 / 120 isn't an operational ZigZag; it's a frozen ZigZag.
Depth = 225
That's already a huge horizon in a 15M chart, approximately 56 hours of structure.

Deviation = 190
Too small compared to Depth.

You're saying:

"It expects a lot... but it pivots for almost nothing."
That generates inconsistent pivots.

Backstep = 120
This is the serious problem.

Backstep should be much smaller than Depth.

What you're saying is pure marketing. It's not technical analysis.

Let me break it down line by line:
"Unique Gold Indicator"—there is no such thing as a unique indicator.

All indicators are combinations of:
price + moving average + volatility + structure.
They change names, but not the physics of the market.

“Gives accurate entries”
An indicator doesn't give precise entries, it gives conditions.
Execution depends on context and management.
If something “precise” existed, you wouldn't sell it for $65; you'd use it to make millions.

“Pass any prop firm challenge” is a giant red flag.
Nobody can guarantee that.

A prop firm evaluates:
1-consistency
2-drawdown
3-risk
4-discipline
No magic indicators.

“Accurate entries on gold and major FX pairs”
Gold and FX are different markets:
XAU = high volatility
EURUSD = low volatility
GBPJPY = impulsive
USDCHF = defensive
An indicator that “does everything” is usually optimized for nothing.
An uncomfortable truth about trading
You sell:
-hope
-simplification
-emotional promises
Profitable traders use:

-structure
-probability
-risk
-repetition
NO MAGIC.

I'm going to tell you exactly what that indicator is, without any marketing hype:
- It's a stepped channel based on swings and trailing levels, NOTHING MORE.

It's not magic.

It's a combination of:
- Donchian Channel
- Smoothed ZigZag
- Dynamic Support/Resistance
- Visual Trailing Stop
The important thing: This type of indicator:
✔ works in trends
❌ fails in ranges because it's a follower channel.

When the market goes sideways, it will devour your capital with false signals.

You only show the pretty part.

You don't show:
- Chop
- Whipsaws
- Consecutive losses
This is classic marketing and outlook, and what you're not saying is that this indicator doesn't predict; it only reacts to past performance.

Exactly the same as:
- Donchian 20
- ATR Channel
- Supertrend
- Chandelier Exit
- Keltner
- Turtle Trailing Stop

 I DO NOT RECOMMEND THIS INDICATOR

Mohit Dhariwal  
CrudeOil Best Strategy #:
Let me tell you straight: that setup is broken. And I'm not being insulting—I'm being mathematical.

225 / 190 / 120 isn't an operational ZigZag; it's a frozen ZigZag.
Depth = 225
That's already a huge horizon in a 15M chart, approximately 56 hours of structure.

Deviation = 190
Too small compared to Depth.

You're saying:

"It expects a lot... but it pivots for almost nothing."
That generates inconsistent pivots.

Backstep = 120
This is the serious problem.

Backstep should be much smaller than Depth.

What you're saying is pure marketing. It's not technical analysis.

Let me break it down line by line:
"Unique Gold Indicator"—there is no such thing as a unique indicator.

All indicators are combinations of:
price + moving average + volatility + structure.
They change names, but not the physics of the market.

“Gives accurate entries”
An indicator doesn't give precise entries, it gives conditions.
Execution depends on context and management.
If something “precise” existed, you wouldn't sell it for $65; you'd use it to make millions.

“Pass any prop firm challenge” is a giant red flag.
Nobody can guarantee that.

A prop firm evaluates:
1-consistency
2-drawdown
3-risk
4-discipline
No magic indicators.

“Accurate entries on gold and major FX pairs”
Gold and FX are different markets:
XAU = high volatility
EURUSD = low volatility
GBPJPY = impulsive
USDCHF = defensive
An indicator that “does everything” is usually optimized for nothing.
An uncomfortable truth about trading
You sell:
-hope
-simplification
-emotional promises
Profitable traders use:

-structure
-probability
-risk
-repetition
NO MAGIC.

I'm going to tell you exactly what that indicator is, without any marketing hype:
- It's a stepped channel based on swings and trailing levels, NOTHING MORE.

It's not magic.

It's a combination of:
- Donchian Channel
- Smoothed ZigZag
- Dynamic Support/Resistance
- Visual Trailing Stop
The important thing: This type of indicator:
✔ works in trends
❌ fails in ranges because it's a follower channel.

When the market goes sideways, it will devour your capital with false signals.

You only show the pretty part.

You don't show:
- Chop
- Whipsaws
- Consecutive losses
This is classic marketing and outlook, and what you're not saying is that this indicator doesn't predict; it only reacts to past performance.

Exactly the same as:
- Donchian 20
- ATR Channel
- Supertrend
- Chandelier Exit
- Keltner
- Turtle Trailing Stop

 I DO NOT RECOMMEND THIS INDICATOR

Kindly use the PR BAND PROP EXTENSION AND RSI CANDLES IT WORKING GREAT FOR MORE THAN 100 USERS THERE IS NO POINT COMMENTNG WITHOUT USING ALL THE TOOLS REQUIRED AS ALL USERS ARE USING IT SUCCESSFULLY 
Nur Nutzer, die das Produkt gekauft oder gemietet haben, können Kommentare hinterlassen