30 000 USD
ダウンロードされたデモ:
671
パブリッシュ済み:
18 2月 2025
現在のバージョン:
1.8
Didn't find a suitable robot?
Order your own one
on Freelance
フリーランスにアクセス
Order your own one
on Freelance
取引の機会を逃しています。
- 無料取引アプリ
- 8千を超えるシグナルをコピー
- 金融ニュースで金融マーケットを探索
I bought this EA in the hope that it would make money.
I will do the tests and we will see.
After a few hours of use in the Asian session, he commented so extreme?
Please understand that Forex is risky and there is a risk of loss. Forex is probability and there is a probability of losing trades.
In which, the default setting of the EA has Stop Loss = 350 (points) which is quite short and the loss is usually small. Because the Stop Loss is shorter, the probability of hitting SL may be higher than expected. If the Stop Loss value is increased, the probability of hitting SL will be lower, but it also requires more profitable trades to balance the loss. Therefore, fine-tuning the Stop Loss value can optimize the results to suit each person.
The default Stop Loss in version 1.0 is Stop Loss = 350. I am considering increasing the default value SL in the next upgrade. But you can set Stop Loss to a higher value by yourself.
If you are sensitive to SL (feel psychological pressure when hitting SL), you can increase this value to reduce the probability of hitting SL. For example, with XAUUSD 2 digits, you can set Stop Loss = 3000 to 5000, with XAUUSD 3 digits, you can set Stop Loss = 30000 to 50000. Setting a large SL value is often suitable for users who prefer continuous profits.
In addition, improve the actual conditions to improve the results. For example, trading with spread = 20 is often better than spread = 50, so choose a lower spread account type to optimize. Similar to slippage, broker quality, lag, latency, vps... Because actual fluctuations and bad conditions such as high spread, high slippage, lag, high latency also often cause SL to be hit more often.
More specifically:
+ Try with different Stop Loss settings. Or after about 300 trades, evaluate how many points the trades usually lose before reaching the profit target. For example, if you see that most trades only lose 700 points before returning to the profit side, then setting Stop Loss = 750 is reasonable. This is just an example of optimizing parameters based on real-world assessment. Assuming that all conditions are good.
Domyślny Stop Loss w wersji 1.0 to Stop Loss = 350. Zastanawiam się nad zwiększeniem domyślnej wartości SL w następnym upgrade. Ale możesz samodzielnie ustawić Stop Loss na wyższą wartość.
Jeśli jesteś wrażliwy na SL (czujesz presję psychologiczną podczas uderzania w SL), możesz zwiększyć tę wartość, aby zmniejszyć prawdopodobieństwo trafienia w SL. Na przykład przy 2 cyfrach XAUUSD możesz ustawić Stop Loss = 3000 do 5000, przy XAUUSD 3 cyfrach możesz ustawić Stop Loss = 30000 do 50000. Ustawienie dużej wartości SL jest często odpowiednie dla użytkowników, którzy preferują ciągłe zyski.
Ponadto popraw rzeczywiste warunki, aby poprawić wyniki. Na przykład, handel ze spreadem = 20 jest często lepszy niż spread = 50, więc wybierz typ konta o niższym spreadzie, aby zoptymalizować. Podobnie jak poślizg, jakość brokera, lag, opóźnienie, vps... Ponieważ rzeczywiste wahania i złe warunki, takie jak wysoki spread, duży poślizg, lag, duże opóźnienia, często powodują również częstsze uderzanie w SL.
W szczególności:
+ Wypróbuj z różnymi ustawieniami Stop Loss. Lub po około 300 transakcjach oceń, ile punktów zwykle tracą transakcje, zanim osiągną cel zysku. Na przykład, jeśli widzisz, że większość transakcji traci tylko 700 punktów przed powrotem do strony zysku, ustawienie Stop Loss = 750 jest rozsądne. To tylko przykład optymalizacji parametrów w oparciu o ocenę w świecie rzeczywistym. Zakładając, że wszystkie warunki są dobre.
I own a VPS. Spread = 5-10 broker IcMarket.
I will check the SL increase.
My little experience with ICM****s:
+ ICM****s is better than ICM****sSC
+ Different servers of ICM****s (or SC) often have different lag levels, giving different experiences. Some servers are quite laggy, some are quite smooth, but random. Users should change their account number if they experience lag, freeze, high slippage or feel the results are worse than expected. It could be that ICM has too many users causing lag.
+ ICM demo server often lags during peak hours, which causes demo accounts to be frozen frequently.
+ ICM seems to have higher slippage than other brokers on XAUUSD.
+ ICM has about 50+ servers, but the quality of the servers is not the same and random. Sometimes server 22 is better than the others but sometimes server 22 is worse, just an example… Maybe ICM has too many traders and this creates local lag. This is quite similar to online game servers that are sometimes overloaded and laggy. So you should regularly change accounts to change servers if you find trading seems to be slow and laggy, this is due to server overload even if your VPS has a 0.1ms latency.
Moje małe doświadczenia z ICM****s:
+ ICM****s jest lepszy niż ICM****sSC
+ Różne serwery ICM****s (lub SC) często mają różne poziomy opóźnień, co zapewnia różne doświadczenia. Niektóre serwery są dość opóźnione, niektóre są dość płynne, ale losowe. Użytkownicy powinni zmienić numer swojego konta, jeśli doświadczają opóźnień, zamrożenia, dużego poślizgu lub czują, że wyniki są gorsze niż oczekiwano. Możliwe, że ICM ma zbyt wielu użytkowników, co powoduje opóźnienia.
+ Serwer demonstracyjny ICM często opóźnia się w godzinach szczytu, co powoduje częste zawieszanie kont demo.
+ ICM wydaje się mieć wyższy poślizg niż inni brokerzy na XAUUSD.
+ ICM ma około 50+ serwerów, ale jakość serwerów nie jest taka sama i losowa. Czasami serwer 22 jest lepszy od innych, ale czasami serwer 22 jest gorszy, to tylko przykład... Być może ICM ma zbyt wielu traderów, co powoduje lokalne opóźnienia. Jest to dość podobne do serwerów gier online, które czasami są przeciążone i opóźnione. Dlatego powinieneś regularnie zmieniać konta, aby zmieniać serwery, jeśli zauważysz, że handel wydaje się być powolny i opóźniony, jest to spowodowane przeciążeniem serwera, nawet jeśli Twój VPS ma opóźnienie 0,1 ms.
The system is hopeless. I have thrown it away. I'm not going to move the piano to the chair.
Ordinary honesty dictates that you should return the money to me. I will not be returning to it.
Please understand that Forex is risky and financial products in the forex market also have potential risks. In which, forex and trading are probabilities and there is a probability of losses. Therefore, your expectation of a refund in the situation of losing trading orders is unreasonable and not accepted. And we do not discuss this situation further.
Please understand that losing trades may occur and create discomfort for traders, but in the forex market and trading, there is always a probability of them occurring. Therefore, you can reduce the risk (reduce lot size, reduce account balance) to feel more comfortable.
Understand that real-life conditions often affect the results, in which fluctuations in spread, slippage, liquidity, lag, latency, data quality, server and broker quality... in the real market often make the results different from expectations. Therefore, improve the operating conditions and experiment with different conditions to optimize your results.
Version 1.1 released.
Hello, EA has new version 1.3, please upgrade to new version.
Hello, EA has new version 1.3, please upgrade to new version.
I sent you a private message.
The new version 1.4 gives hope for a very good system.
I am currently testing.
for gold 3 digits
with acc have 200$
my spread is 10-16
just need the best setting and will share the profit with you all
Provedl jsem příslušné změny v nastavení a výsledky jsou senzační.
HELLO MY FRIEND...
HAVE A BEST SETUP FOR XAUUSD
Hi there,
The result on any day when the EA was active is completely different from backest on mt4 for the same day. The backtest has impressively higher success rate.... somethings amiss here. The latency is < 5m, the average spread is 1.5 and slippage is not an issue at all. Could you please explain?
Thanks
Hi,
This is actually normal behavior. MT4 backtests are simulations, not real-market reproductions. Even with low latency, tight spreads, and minimal slippage, live trading is affected by factors that backtesting cannot fully model, such as real tick sequencing, execution priority, liquidity, and broker-side execution rules.
Because of that, results on a specific day will almost never match the backtest exactly, and backtests often look better than live results.
My suggestion is to treat the backtest as a structural reference, not a performance guarantee. You can try optimizing conditions gradually — for example:
+ Test with a different broker or account type
+ Compare ECN vs Pro/RAW or Cent accounts
+ Adjust risk and execution-related parameters
Different environments produce different outcomes, and finding the setup that works best for your broker and conditions is part of the process.