Dax EA
499 USD
Versione demo scaricata:
323
Pubblicato:
11 luglio 2025
Versione attuale:
1.3
Non hai trovato un robot adatto?
Ordina il tuo
su Freelance
Vai alla sezione Freelance
Ordina il tuo
su Freelance
Come acquistare un Robot di Trading o un indicatore
Esegui il tuo EA
hosting virtuale
hosting virtuale
Prova un indicatore/robot di trading prima di acquistarlo
Vuoi guadagnare nel Market?
Come presentare un prodotto per venderlo con successo
Ti stai perdendo delle opportunità di trading:
- App di trading gratuite
- Oltre 8.000 segnali per il copy trading
- Notizie economiche per esplorare i mercati finanziari
Registrazione
Accedi
Accetti la politica del sito e le condizioni d’uso
Se non hai un account, registrati

This is My ICMarkets 0.3 lot ( 3 times more than Tomasz with fast closing today's trades)
I also had a loss (full SL), but that equals about 3 × $3 = $10 for a 0.3 lot position with contract size 1. As far as I know, you use Tickmill, Tomasz, and on Tickmill the contract size should also be 1 — unless the screenshot you shared is not actually from Tickmill.
For example, this is on FusionMarkets using the default settings but with Fast Closing = True. Normally, I don’t like to use this option, but since the choppy market has lasted longer than usual, I activated it on some accounts. I still keep many accounts running without Fast Closing to monitor how the market behaves.As shown in the screenshots, once a real breakout happens, the larger take profits can quickly recover previous losses. For now, the market is still in an accumulation phase with limited volatility, so during the EA’s working hours price only touches the key levels without generating strong moves
📊 Why DAX EA Had Losses Recently
Looking at the H1 chart of DAX over the last 10 days, you can clearly see the market is playing in a range. During the first EU hour (the EA’s main active period), the price repeatedly touches the key resistance and support levels — but instead of breaking through, it quickly reverses back.
This is a textbook example of the accumulation phase at all-time highs (ATH):
Many false breakouts occur, where the price pushes above/below a level but snaps back almost immediately.
The EA often catches these moves, but because they fail quickly, the trades end in small profits (thanks to trailing/fast closing) or occasionally full stop losses.
⚠️ How long can this phase last?
Accumulation phases can last weeks, even months. For example, after the ATH in 2021, DAX consolidated in a range for nearly 3 months before a real breakout.
✅ What happens next?
When a real breakout finally comes, it usually happens fast and without retracement. At that point, the EA’s take profits are much larger than the stop losses, so just a few strong trades can recover recent losses quickly and move into net profits.
👉 So the last two months reflect a market condition, not a weakness in the EA. Ranging periods at ATH are always tricky, but breakouts always return — and that’s where the EA shows its real strength.
“As shown in the screenshot, when a real breakout occurs, the larger take profits can recover those losses very quickly. This example is only from a subset of strategies (1–6). If all 23 strategies were active, there would have been roughly four times more trades like this during the same period.”all loosing strategies were removed form market, be carefully
🚩 Not accurate. I didn’t remove any “losing strategies.” To reduce confusion from multiple separate signals, I consolidated everything into one default signal (all strategies + Fast Closing = TRUE, latest update). 📢 I announced this here and in the reviews. 🔎 All older signals remain visible on MyFXbook—as stated earlier. Transparency first.
I clearly mentioned that several days ago in the group and public chat on MQL5
all loosing strategies were removed form market, be carefully
Let me open one of them to see the details! You look at only the growing curve day by day or a month
Let me open this, for example, in detail:
When I want to analyse a signal, I also check DD, and automated trading percent ( to make sure all trades are made by an EA, not with manual intervention)
I also check the monthly performance. You may have hundreds of strategies in the EA. The advantage of having them separately is that you can choose which strategies fit you best. If I made 4 separate signals for it, this is exactly the reason behind it. When there is only one signal for all of them, analysing them can be difficult, especially for users. You tell me, Tomasz, regarding all the above factors, low DD in the range, reasonable performance in the worst time of the Index market that all other EAs on the market have lost much bigger and even much longer
Many users asked for set files matching the 4 signal groups. I’ve kept the EA set-file free and simple to avoid confusion, but separate signals were making things harder to follow.
So I merged everything into one default signal (all strategies) with Fast Closing = TRUE.
✅ All old signal records remain on MyFXbook (see the link above) for full transparency.
Why the new signal is on Tickmill
It’s not because Tickmill is “better” than IC Markets.
I’ve simply hit the account limit at IC Markets / IC Trading, so I can’t open new signals there.
I still believe IC Markets / IC Trading perform best for my EAs. For now, the default live signal runs on Tickmill due to the account cap.
https://www.mql5.com/en/signals/2331032
Why the new Tickmill signal is empty
On Sep 11, trades triggered on all brokers except Tickmill.
That’s why the new Tickmill default signal (created a few days ago) is still empty.
This is normal—feed/spread/rollover timing can differ by broker and skip a setup.
All older per-strategy tracks remain on MyFXbook; the consolidated default signal link is in the pinned post. 📌📊
I had trades with all brokers on Sep 11, except Tickmill ( the new live signal with default and fast closing=True)
DAX EA, Latest trades. running default. ( Fast closing = False)As I mentioned before, when the market comes out of the Tiny range, then profits will be much bigger
📌 Choosing the Right Broker for Scalping
For scalping strategies (like DAX EA), broker quality is critical. Scalping requires:
Low spreads
Low slippage
Fast ECN execution
🔹 Top brokers for scalping
ICMarkets, IC Trading, FPMarkets, Fusion Markets – reliable for scalping systems.
🔹 Average brokers
Tickmill (and recently ICMarkets & IC Trading since summer, due to server freezes and negative slippage that affect profits).
🔹 Bad brokers for scalping
FBS, Pepperstone, and others in the same category.
⚠️ Reminder:
We are not committed to using grade B or bad brokers when results are unstable. The best practice is to run a realtick backtest directly on the broker’s platform while connected to your live account.
If the backtest with real ticks is not profitable, then live trading will definitely be worse (due to execution delays, server freezes, and negative slippage).
❗ Still, some users insist on using under-average or bad brokers for scalping and expect stable results. It doesn’t work that way.
👉 The solution is simple: switch to a better broker that provides stable conditions.
✅ Note: Based on my tests, since this summer, FPMarkets and Fusion Markets have been performing better than other brokers.
📢 DAX EA — Update Version 1.2 Released
Dear users,
The new version 1.2 of DAX EA is now available.
🆕 What’s new:
A new sector has been added: Intraday_Single_Strategy
When this strategy is enabled, all other strategies are inactive by default
This offers a safer and more stable configuration during the current market conditions
⚙️ How to update:
Remove the EA from the chart
Update to version 1.2
Attach the EA again
In the inputs, change the value of the first strategy from False → True (as shown in the screenshot)
📄 More details:
Full explanation is available in the EA’s comment notes.
Thank you for your support — and good luck with the new setup!
Fast closing ( last 23 strs) vs the new version, just Intraday single strs

Fast closing + defaultDAX EA New sector Intra day single Str
This is currently the strongest R:R setup I have achieved on DAX.
It does not trade very frequently, because the intraday module is based on a weekly breakout structure, but performance remains very consistent across most brokers, since it is not a fast scalping system.
✔ You normally get one trade per day
✔ Max stop loss is around 5 USD for 0.1 lot / contract size 1
✔ Best take profit is around 6 USD
✔ Trailing stop is moderate, not aggressive
Overall, it provides very stable and safe execution with excellent risk-to-reward.
I want to clarify a few important points for everyone, following a recent low-rating review.
✔️ The strategies are real and rule-based.
This EA is not curve-fitted, grid, or martingale-based. The logic and behavior have been explained many times in the public group with charts and live market context.
✔️ DAX market conditions have been exceptional.
For several months, DAX has been trading at all-time highs with unusually tight weekly ranges. This is an exceptional market regime that has not occurred even once in the last 4 years. In such conditions, many legitimate strategies underperform — this is a market issue, not a strategy integrity issue.
✔️ This is not unique to my EA.
To give an objective reference: Wim, one of the most reliable and well-known sellers on the MQL5 market, has publicly visible live records for ORB Master. If you review those records after several months of live trading, you will see that DAX is the only consistently unprofitable pair, again due to the same abnormal market tempo and structure. This confirms that the issue is market-specific, not seller- or EA-specific.
✔️ Active adaptation, not abandonment.
Instead of ignoring the problem, I released two significant updates:
First update: Fast-closing logic to reduce exposure during compression phases
Second update: Intraday-focused logic with stricter entry criteria, specifically designed to navigate this period
These updates were proactive and aimed at surviving and adapting, not chasing risky gains.
✔️ Signals & holidays clarification.
MQL5 automatically disables signals after inactivity (for example during holidays). This happened multiple times and the signals were re-added accordingly. The claim that there were “no trades for several months” is factually incorrect — the signals were active before the holiday period.
✔️ Why this is a public group.
This is intentionally a public discussion group, not a one-way marketing channel. Unlike many sellers who only run channels where they speak alone, here users can ask questions, challenge logic, and see real explanations. Transparency sometimes brings criticism, but it also brings honesty.
⚠️ Final important note:
No EA can be profitable in all market regimes unless it uses grid/martingale or oversized stop losses. This EA is designed with risk control and long-term survival as priorities — not illusionary performance during abnormal conditions.
Everyone is free to make their own decisions. My responsibility is to be transparent, adaptive, and honest — and that is exactly what I continue to do.