|
no
experiencia
|
8
productos
|
0
versiones demo
|
|
0
trabajos
|
0
señales
|
0
suscriptores
|
https://www.mql5.com/en/job/new?prefered=bugraky123
https://www.mql5.com/en/channels/trendtower
Engineered by Experience. Built for the Markets.
With more than 20 years of experience in software development and engineering, and over a decade dedicated specifically to algorithmic trading, our team combines deep technical expertise with extensive real-market trading knowledge.
Every Expert Advisor and indicator we develop is engineered with precision, discipline, and attention to detail. From strategy architecture and signal logic to execution, risk management, filtering, and user experience, every component is carefully designed and refined by an experienced development team.
We do not believe in releasing unfinished ideas. Every product goes through extensive development cycles, historical backtesting, forward testing, market-condition analysis, and continuous refinement before being introduced to the MQL5 Market.
Our goal is not simply to automate trading decisions, but to build robust, intelligent, and professionally engineered trading systems capable of adapting to the realities of modern financial markets.
We focus on reliability, execution quality, logical consistency, risk awareness, and long-term usability. Our systems are developed using years of accumulated trading experience, quantitative analysis, and advanced software engineering principles.
We approach every product as a serious engineering project — not as a simple trading script.
Our Expert Advisors and indicators are designed for traders who value technology, transparency, disciplined execution, and sophisticated market logic.
Behind every product is extensive research, countless tests, continuous optimization, and one clear objective:
To create professional-grade algorithmic trading tools that traders can use with confidence.
Because behind every chart, every position, and every decision, there is a trader working toward a goal.
We hope our technology becomes a trusted part of that journey — helping you trade with greater discipline, clarity, and confidence.
May every system we build bring you one step closer to your goals, and may every trade be made with knowledge, patience, and purpose.
From our team to yours — trade wisely, stay disciplined, and may the markets reward your preparation.
An algorithm’s true value lies not only in the trends it captures, but also in how it behaves under challenging conditions.
Testing is an integral part of Trend Tower’s engineering process. Our focus goes beyond historical results to examine decision-making consistency, risk management, and system behavior across different market conditions.
We are developing, testing, and refining the details. Our goal is to deliver a carefully engineered system with clear logic behind every decision.
Trend Tower is still in development. We will continue sharing updates from the process here.
Algo Teknik
Quant Key Levels, versión 1.0. Los niveles de referencia con los que trabaja realmente un operador discrecional, en un único gráfico y en un único lenguaje visual. Once familias, cada una con su propio control, y nada en el gráfico que no se haya ganado con un nivel. Lo que lo diferencia de un paquete de pivotes no es el número de familias. Es que lo que la mayoría de las herramientas de niveles dan por sentado, esta herramienta lo mide. La diferencia horaria entre el reloj de tu bróker y el
Quant Desk Pro Un gestor de operaciones nativo de R para MetaTrader 5. Gestiona las operaciones que ya has abierto: calcula el riesgo real de cada una, las protege, reduce la posición según el plan que hayas establecido, ajusta el stop de las operaciones restantes y cierra toda la cartera cuando la jornada ha ido lo suficientemente mal. Lee esto primero. Quant Desk Pro no abre operaciones y no genera señales. Además, se entrega en MODO DE SOLO VISUALIZACIÓN : no enviará ni una sola orden hasta
Something new is rising.
For a long time, we have been building, testing and refining what will become the flagship trading system of Algoteknik.
Its name is Trend Tower.
Designed to go beyond simple trend detection, Trend Tower is being developed to evaluate market structure, trend quality and trading conditions as one unified system.
We are not ready to reveal everything yet.
Over the coming weeks, we will share selected development notes, real market examples, testing results and individual layers of the system — step by step.
Trend Tower is coming.
Smart Volatility Squeeze MT5 Smart Volatility Squeeze MT5 es un indicador de compresión de la volatilidad y expansión del impulso para MetaTrader 5. Se basa en el marco «Volatility Squeeze» de John Carter y amplía la compresión habitual de un solo nivel a tres niveles de compresión, de modo que permite ver no solo si el mercado está comprimido, sino también el grado de compresión antes de que se expanda. El indicador se abre en una ventana independiente y traza dos elementos: un histograma de
SVS Assistant SVS Assistant es la parte de ejecución de Smart Volatility Squeeze MT5. Ejecuta las órdenes que solicitas desde el «1-Click Trading Desk» de ese indicador, les aplica tus reglas de riesgo y gestiona las posiciones resultantes. Se distribuye de forma gratuita. Por favor, lee esto antes de descargarlo: no analiza el mercado ni genera señales por sí mismo. Si el indicador Smart Volatility Squeeze no se está ejecutando en el mismo gráfico, no tiene nada que analizar y no hará
Smart Exit EA: aprovecha la tendencia, evita las oscilaciones El EA Smart Exit sigue la tendencia mediante una línea de seguimiento ATR adaptativa y permanece en el movimiento hasta que la tendencia cambia realmente. Está diseñado para resolver dos problemas que todo operador de tendencias conoce: salir de una buena operación demasiado pronto y sufrir las fluctuaciones en un mercado lateral. Las notas de la versión, los ejemplos gráficos y los anuncios de nuevos productos se publican en el canal
Perfeccionar el OBV El OBV refinado mide el flujo de volumen acumulado comparándolo con su propia línea de señal adaptativa, con un margen codificado por colores y detección de divergencias sin repintado. El volumen en equilibrio (OBV) sin procesar responde a una pregunta: ¿el volumen se atribuye a los compradores o a los vendedores? Aunque útil, el OBV sin procesar es una simple línea errática sin punto de referencia. Refine OBV añade una media móvil exponencial (EMA) adaptativa del propio
Tendencia Trix algoteknik · Manual de indicadores de MetaTrader 5 Descripción general Trix Trend es un oscilador de impulso basado en el TRIX, es decir, la tasa de variación de una media móvil exponencial del precio con triple suavizado. El triple suavizado elimina la mayor parte del ruido a corto plazo, por lo que el oscilador reacciona al impulso subyacente del movimiento en lugar de a cada pequeña fluctuación, al tiempo que sigue siendo más sensible que una simple media móvil larga. El
Smart Chandelier Exit «Smart Chandelier Exit» es un indicador adaptativo de stop dinámico y de dirección de tendencia. Traza una línea de stop escalonada de varias capas que sigue la evolución del precio: verde por debajo del precio en una tendencia alcista, roja por encima del precio en una tendencia bajista. La línea solo avanza a favor de la tendencia, nunca en su contra, por lo que actúa como un stop dinámico mecánico y como una señal clara del estado de la tendencia. Lo que la hace
One of the biggest misconceptions in algorithmic trading is believing that a profitable backtest automatically means a profitable trading system.
After spending more than two decades developing trading software and testing countless strategies, we've noticed that many Expert Advisors fail for surprisingly similar reasons.
Here are some of the most common mistakes.
### 1. Over-Optimization
Many EAs are optimized until they perfectly fit historical data.
The result often looks impressive:
* High profit factor
* Smooth equity curve
* Small drawdown
Unfortunately, once market conditions change, these systems frequently collapse because they learned historical noise instead of real market behavior.
---
### 2. Ignoring Different Market Regimes
Markets constantly transition between:
* Trending
* Ranging
* High volatility
* Low volatility
* News-driven periods
An EA that performs exceptionally during one regime may struggle significantly during another.
A robust algorithm should adapt or selectively avoid unfavorable environments rather than forcing trades everywhere.
---
### 3. Drawdown Matters More Than Profit
Many traders focus almost exclusively on annual returns.
In reality, long-term survival depends much more on drawdown.
Would you rather have:
* 60% annual return with 70% drawdown?
or
* 30% annual return with 12% drawdown?
Professional money management almost always favors the second option.
---
### 4. Risk Management Is the Real Strategy
Many developers spend months improving entry signals while dedicating little attention to:
* Position sizing
* Exposure control
* Consecutive loss protection
* Equity protection
* Volatility filters
Ironically, these components often have a greater impact on long-term performance than the entry logic itself.
---
### 5. Transparency Builds Trust
In today's marketplace, traders are becoming more experienced.
Most buyers now prefer to evaluate:
* Long-term backtests
* Forward testing
* Maximum drawdown
* Recovery factor
* Sharpe Ratio
* Profit Factor
instead of simply looking at total profit.
Providing transparent statistics helps users make informed decisions.
---
### Final Thoughts
There is no "perfect" Expert Advisor.
Markets evolve, volatility changes, and no algorithm wins forever.
However, an EA designed with realistic expectations, strong risk management, and disciplined development principles has a much better chance of surviving changing market conditions.
I'm curious to hear other developers' experiences.
**In your opinion, what is the biggest reason most Expert Advisors eventually fail?**
When evaluating an Expert Advisor, many traders immediately look at one number:
**Total Profit.**
While profit is obviously important, experienced developers often pay much closer attention to something else:
**Maximum Drawdown.**
Imagine these two systems.
### EA A
* Total Return: +320%
* Maximum Drawdown: 58%
* Profit Factor: 1.45
### EA B
* Total Return: +180%
* Maximum Drawdown: 14%
* Profit Factor: 2.10
At first glance, EA A appears far more attractive.
But would you really be comfortable watching your account lose more than half its value before recovering?
For many traders, the answer is no.
---
## Drawdown Is More Than a Number
Large drawdowns create psychological pressure.
Many traders stop using an EA precisely when it is about to recover.
Even if the strategy eventually reaches new equity highs, the user may have already abandoned it.
This is one reason why many excellent algorithms never stay in real accounts for very long.
---
## Capital Preservation Comes First
Professional money managers often repeat a simple principle:
**Protect capital first. Generate returns second.**
An EA that survives difficult market conditions has a much greater chance of producing attractive long-term returns.
Once an account experiences a 50% drawdown, it requires a 100% gain just to break even.
That recovery is much harder than many traders realize.
---
## Metrics Should Be Evaluated Together
Rather than focusing only on net profit, I believe an EA should always be evaluated using multiple statistics together.
For example:
* Maximum Drawdown
* Profit Factor
* Sharpe Ratio
* Recovery Factor
* Number of Trades
* Average Trade Duration
* Expected Payoff
* Consecutive Wins and Losses
A strategy with moderate returns but excellent consistency can often outperform a highly aggressive strategy over several years.
---
## Risk Management Is Often the Hidden Edge
In my experience, the difference between an average EA and a professional one is not always the entry signal.
Instead, it is usually found in:
* Position sizing
* Exposure limits
* Volatility filters
* Equity protection
* Session filters
* Trade management
Many developers underestimate how much these components influence long-term performance.
---
## What Do You Think?
If you had to choose only one Expert Advisor for the next five years, which would you prefer?
* Higher returns with larger drawdowns?
* Lower returns with much better capital preservation?
I'd be interested to hear how other developers and traders prioritize risk versus performance.
