Discussion of article "Self-optimization of EA: Evolutionary and genetic algorithms" - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Let's discuss the topic more specifically, please.
1. Regarding the code on MCLs.
This article is a continuation of the previous one (about self-control and self-learning) in the appendix to which two working experts are placed. This article shows an option of adding functionality - self-optimisation. Adding this functionality to a working Expert Advisor (or rather to its R script) is not a difficult task for a programmer. But this set (self-control, self-learning and self-optimisation) are the determinants for really reliable and advanced Expert Advisors.
In my opinion and considerable experience, optimisation a kilometre deep in history is futile. A really working system should independently react to changes in the market state and rearrange its parameters (and maybe even the algorithm) maintaining the required quality of work. The solutions proposed in the articles are directed in this direction.
Not at all belittling the quality of the previously proposed GA library (I remember this article in a distant year), but it is not in any comparison with the capabilities of libraries and packages of today. Although everyone can choose a convenient option for themselves. The respondent's vehement offence is incomprehensible....
2. Programmers communicating here speak different languages (I mean software languages) and everyone has his own preferences, it's normal. It's not normal when discussion turns into shambles for some unknown reason.
3. Is no one interested in the practical possibility of optimising trading system parameters "on the fly"?
Good luck
I urge all participants to be mutually polite. Especially San Sanych...
These are not my posts, but posts addressed to me:
And shove your R knowledge up your anus.
You would have had to visit a jaw surgeon after our nice conversation, at the very least.
Would you be so kind as to:
1. accurately cite the authors
2. Clean a very decent branch of anuses.
...
Not at all detracting from the quality of the previously proposed GA library (I remember this article from back in the day), but it doesn't compare to the capabilities of today's libraries and packages. Although everyone can choose a convenient option for themselves. The respondent's vehement offence is incomprehensible ....
...
There is no offence. I was just curious about the codes, what offence is there....
Well, I'm glad for the progress, it's not standing still. Are you ready to participate in your own kind of algorithm championship? Let's create a separate thread, define the task and announce the conditions. Maybe other participants will join us, and if not - we will participate in two, me and you.
You can use a library in R, it makes no difference to me. But the only condition is that the executable file must be written in MQL.
Now those are not my posts, those are posts directed at me:
And shove your R knowledge up your anus.
You would have had to visit a jaw surgeon after our lovely conversation, at the very least.
Would you be so kind as to:
1. accurately cite the authors
2. Clean a very decent branch of anuses.
No offence taken. I was just curious about the codes, no offence taken....
Well, I'm glad for the progress, it's not standing still. Are you ready to participate in some kind of algorithm championship? Let's create a separate thread, define the task and announce the conditions. Maybe other participants will join us, and if not - we will participate in two, me and you.
You can use a library in R, it makes no difference to me. But the only condition is that the executable file must be written in MQL.
What is the purpose of the event?
What's the purpose of the event?
The primary purpose is sporting interest.
The secondary goal is to confirm your words "Without detracting from the quality of the previously proposed GA library (I remember this article in a distant year), but it does not compare in any way with the capabilities of libraries and packages of today", i.e. to ensure nationwide jubilation in connection with the joy of contemplation of non-stagnant progress. And so we will increase the work capacity/motivation of writers and traders, the turnover of funds in the services of programmers/customers will increase, trade turnovers on the market will increase, GDP will rise, trade and industry will revive.
That is, a very important event.
No offence intended. How long have you been wearing the harness?
...
Are you ready to participate in your own kind of algorithm championship? Let's create a separate thread, define the task and announce the conditions. Maybe other participants will come, and if not - we'll participate together, me and you.
...
Well, that's too bad. Looks like there won't be a film....
Not many people watch their mouths these days...... Think before you say anything to avoid embarrassing situations.
The primary purpose is sporting interest.
The secondary goal is to confirm your words "Without detracting from the quality of the previously proposed GA library (I remember this article in a distant year), but it does not compare in any way with the capabilities of libraries and packages of today", i.e. to ensure nationwide jubilation in connection with the joy of contemplation of non-stagnant progress. And so we will increase the work capacity/motivation of writers and traders, the turnover of funds in the services of programmers/customers will increase, trade turnovers on the market will increase, GDP will rise, trade and industry will revive.
That is, a very important event.
Your proposed Main Goal is not interesting. (kindergarten)
Secondary - I'm ready to confirm my words. I will provide a complex function, you try to solve it with your library, I will solve it with mine. Let's compare accuracy and speed.
Watch your words and don't fall into childishness. Seriously.