Expert Advisors: Jolly Roger EA Version - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I haven't analysed Pirate's algorithm, but in my opinion it was the winner. I mean, "Profit" there is clamped by settings, but how it was swimming....
I can't write something super fast, pips, of course with a result ))))
Look at the links may give you an idea. If you dig up something else don't forget about me ))
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/136757 eugetrofi
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/130054 sanyoyok
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum slava
Check out the links might lead to an idea )
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/136757 eugetrophy
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/130054 sanyoyoek
https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum slava
Senks ))))
I'll write, not reading the first paragraph. The first link immediately "cursed" about the "tester for 6-13 points".
Here I opened a thread about NDD, and worked on the real. Instant execution, considered without spread + commission 0.4 standard points. Maybe there would go.
Unless, of course, it is not a tester grail with the first tick, although it may have been fixed.
does anyone know why the order is sent out in thirds???? wouldn't it be more efficient to execute one trade operation?
does anyone know why the order is sent out in thirds???? wouldn't it be more efficient to execute one trade operation?
does anyone know why the order is sent out in thirds???? wouldn't it be more efficient to execute one trade operation?
Hi theDUDE,
I think that's the habit from MT4 to avoid margin call. When margin call occur, broker will close trader position starting from the biggest losing one, until trader account is above margin call level. By dividing position like that (by 3 or 7 or 23), trader will still get its position closed but not all of them because his/her account may already above margin call level when some of his/her position get closed. So the trader still get some of position closed and some still open.
I think that's only work on MT4 which is ticket based trading.
Hi@all,
i test the ea at the moment but i don´t fund any good settings...
Could someone post settings who work well?
At the Moment i test 410000 combinations but the result takes some time... ;)Hi
I like the concept of this EA and it works very well. But it only seems to be working on USDEUR.
I tried it on other currencies and i get the [invalid Price] error quite a lot. Anybody got any explenations for that? Or what do i have to change to make it work on other currencies?
@Nixon007
some very conservative settings work fine. For me Level 20 and period 21 are nice (Tp 150, sl 40). Trades are seldom and profits arent that high, but at least its steady and without much drawdown (as my priorities are)
I am not fully understood why do we have to create a PENDING at first, then modify the order later? why do not we create a "DEAL" order immediately?
even we wanna create a pending order, shall we create an BUY order with request.price=NormalizeDouble(Ask-StopLevel*_Point,_Digits); rather than PLUS the StopLevel*_Point
any clarification will be much appreciated!