Setup a Trading Bot with Volume CVD Divergence & other confluences - Help welcome

New comment
 
Hello friends !! 


I'm currently using AI to help me build the trading bot of my dreams, which tbh originates from a private community i'm in, they have a super good EA but i hate losing control and not having it for me.

Basically it's a trading bot created by some veterans of a big broker and it's invite only for big players in the brokers, which i'm not but my friend is so a few of us are getting access to it this way - BUT this is not the subject of this thread.


Is there any ways to reverse engineer the actual strategies and functions of the trading bot without having any files provided but solely by watching behavior ? 

From what i know it's based on standard deviations, CVD divergences and TDI for entry refinement.
For entries it's also basing itself on EMA's cross on the lower TF's but i have no details.

I know a few of you are smart, so could you tell me if it's mission impossible to reverse engineer it without the files or more precise informations ?

I hate losing control haha


anyways thanks for your time & help colleagues!!
 
ALCFX1:

yes it is possible to reverse engineer a strategy from the trade statement, but that takes much time to do.

if you are confident of the indicators that are used, then you should place those indicators on some charts and compare the trades from the trade statement with indicator actions. not hard to do, but takes much time and experimentation -- just like creating any other ea/straqtegy.

I recommend that you search this site with search terms including the indicators that you are sure of, and look in codebase for examples of codes that you may wish to combine into single indicators to be used for a strategy and in the ea. This is exactly how i make my own eas and indicators.

 

It is certainly not impossible, however based on the information you provided it is not possible.

What market is being traded? You talk about CVD. On decentralized markets like Forex or CVD's the volume is not accurate enough to be of any use.

New comment