You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Let's throw in iceberg orders while we're at it.
I’d like to discuss the difference between what we often call a “strong breakout” and a “false breakout”. What criteria do you personally use (candlestick body size, volume, retest behavior, multi-timeframe confirmation)?
My observation: sometimes a breakout above recent highs comes with strong follow-through, but other times it fails quickly and returns inside the range. Curious how experienced members differentiate these cases.
I approached this question from a slightly different angle.
Instead of trying to identify strong vs. false breakouts visually, I tested breakouts from time-defined opening ranges by measuring their actual hit rate.
The idea was simple: if the structure is the same, how often does a breakout from that structure really follow through?
What showed up in the data was that range height does matter, but it’s not binary.
Larger ranges tended to align more often with continuation behavior, while very small ranges more frequently produced a clean initial breakout, often sufficient to reach an RRR of around 1:1 when using the opposite side of the range as the SL.
I don’t analyze “context” in a discretionary sense. I just measure outcomes under the same structural conditions and let the statistics speak.
The logic for a breakout for me is if the past candle closed above or below.
For false breakout if the close was not abover or below but the high or low.