Debugger problem:<not implemented>

New comment
 

Hello,

it seems that global variables can not been assigned and inspected.

When inspect in debugger, it just says: <not implemented>.

Also the value seems not to be assigned.


This is a short sample code:

int digits=0;
double point=0.0;
int OnInit()
{
   digits=(int) SymbolInfoInteger(Symbol(),SYMBOL_DIGITS);
   point =SymbolInfoDouble(Symbol(),SYMBOL_POINT);
   return(INIT_SUCCEEDED);
}


If you check digits and point in debugger watch window, the can't be evaluated and you see:<not implemented>.

The debugger watch feature at all has a problem since long time: Deleted variables respawn, regardless how often you deleted them.

My MT5 build is 4660.


How to fix this?

Thanks to community for help.

 
chinaski:

Hello,

it seems that global variables can not been assigned and inspected.

When inspect in debugger, it just says: <not implemented>.

Also the value seems not to be assigned.


This is a short sample code:


If you check digits and point in debugger watch window, the can't be evaluated and you see:<not implemented>.

The debugger watch feature at all has a problem since long time: Deleted variables respawn, regardless how often you deleted them.

My MT5 build is 4660.


How to fix this?

Thanks to community for help.

This is a MT5 bug, You can't fix it but can only hope for the development team to fix it in next versions

 
chinaski:

Hello,

it seems that global variables can not been assigned and inspected.

When inspect in debugger, it just says: <not implemented>.

Also the value seems not to be assigned.


This is a short sample code:


If you check digits and point in debugger watch window, the can't be evaluated and you see:<not implemented>.

The debugger watch feature at all has a problem since long time: Deleted variables respawn, regardless how often you deleted them.

My MT5 build is 4660.


How to fix this?

Thanks to community for help.

It's already fixed. Current beta is 4684.

If you don't want to use beta then wait the next release.

 
Thanks all for reply.
New comment