Discussion of article "Metamodels in machine learning and trading: Original timing of trading orders" - page 9
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I don't have time for any fiction, this thread is about the MoD. I'm not interested in the rest. By the way, articles on quantum physics have appeared there, you can theorise there. The selection of features in IO is solved rather trivially.
Only a trivial problem can be solved in a trivial way. To make a market is a higher-level task.
Only a trivial task can be solved in a trivial way. Making a market is a higher-level task.
If you set yourself impossible tasks, you don't need to solve them. Or solve them together with Napoleons and avatars in the same gazebo. I have rather modest plans in that sense, given my limited talents.
To one he gave fivetalents, to another two, to another one, to each according to his strength; and immediately he departed. He who received the five talents went and put them to work and gained the other five talents; likewise he who received two talents gained the other two; but he who received one talent went and buried it in the ground and hid his master's silver.
Probably, it is not only a matter of quantity, but also how to dispose of them. And there it is about free will and predetermination, but you don't like that.
I'm not very good at precise thinking, as you've noticed. I have to spend a lot of time concretising ideas and translating them into machine code.
But I know for sure that a machine can only learn "by itself" if a human programmes it.
He gave to one he gave fivetalents, to another two, to another one, to each according to his strength; and immediately he departed. And he who had received five talents went and put them to use, and obtained the other five talents; and he who had received two talents obtained the other two; and he who had received one talent went and buried it in the ground, and hid his lord's silver.
Probably, it is not only a matter of quantity, but also how to dispose of them. And there it is already about free will and predetermination, but you do not like it.
I'm not very good at precise thinking, as you've noticed. I have to spend a lot of time concretising ideas and translating them into machine code.
But I know for sure that a machine can "self-learn" only if a human programmes it.
If you are of the die for idea type, that's fine of course. But I wouldn't transfer knowledge from other fields to the market (from experience), with the exception of maths.
so the whole world is made of maths. The physical world is one part of space-time, the mental world is other dimensions of another part of the world. There are differences, of course, but very much the same formulae. The field of intersection and docking is quantum mechanics.
that's how the whole world is created by maths. The physical world is one part of space - time, the mental world is other dimensions of another part of the world. There are differences, of course, but very much the same formulae. The field of intersection and docking is quantum mechanics.
Here, you should pay closer attention to the infrastructure and the peculiarities of the implementation of exchanges, from a technical point of view. There is a lot of useful information buried there in order to draw some conclusions. The rest is all water. One should start from the reason, i.e. from who made it and how and what features are there.
.
nonlinear dynamics is not water. it is complex mathematics, and this is probably where you need talent to understand it. and besides that, you need desire.
Nonlinear dynamics is not water. it is complex maths, and this is probably where you need talent to understand it. and beyond that, desire.
Here, you should pay closer attention to the infrastructure and the peculiarities of the implementation of exchanges, from a technical point of view. There is a lot of useful information buried there in order to draw some conclusions. The rest is all water. One should start from the reason, i.e. from who made it and how and what features are there.
.
Some visualisation of force lines - less than 10% of calculated parameters
Some visualisation of the force lines - less than 10% of the calculated parameters