Discussion of article "Metamodels in machine learning and trading: Original timing of trading orders" - page 8

[Deleted]  
Inquiring #:

You're not very good with Plato. Do you even know Elliot?

I read the first one at university, the second one as a kid.
You have a very Platonic approach to discussion, if you read the Peerage, you'll learn a lot about yourself.
 
Maxim Dmitrievsky #:
I'd rather go straight to Plato's philosophy.

Can you teach a machine to distinguish the first wave - reversal, from the fifth wave - the end of the trend?

[Deleted]  
Inquiring #:

Can a machine be taught to distinguish between the first wave - a reversal, and the fifth wave - the end of the trend?

Is this the evolution of consciousness: Plato-Boson-Elliott?
 
Maxim Dmitrievsky #:
I read the first one at university, the second one as a child
You have a very Platonic approach to discussion, if you read the Peerage you will learn a lot about yourself

You're just like in the anecdote, always thinking about sex.

Plato has more interesting things, Parmenides, for example.

[Deleted]  
Inquiring #:

You're just like the joke, always thinking about sex.

Plato has more interesting things, Parmenides, for example.

Unfortunately (for you), I only believe in econometrics and a little bit of luck.
 
Maxim Dmitrievsky #:
Is this the Plato-Boson-Elliott evolution of consciousness?

I haven't heard anything about Boson. Elliott tries to express Plato's teachings through his theory of waves, unfortunately without much success - there were no computers then, and then his idea was perverted and denigrated.

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky #:
Unfortunately (for you), I only believe in econometrics and a little bit of luck

About econometrics, I adhere to Keynes' views that it is not a science, and Soros' views that there is not a single sensible theory in economics today.

Luck is a capricious lady, in my opinion, stock exchange and casino are a bit different things.

[Deleted]  
Inquiring #:

About econometrics, I hold the views of Keynes that it is not a science and Soros that there is no intelligible theory in economics today.

Luck is a capricious lady, in my opinion, stock exchange and casino are a bit different things.

Econometrics is about analysing and forecasting time series. There's cycles and levels and uncertainty. All the things you love so much, but you approach it through the backyard.
 
Maxim Dmitrievsky #:
Econometrics is about analysing and forecasting time series. There's cycles and levels and uncertainty. All the things you love so much, but you approach it through the backyard.

E. Soroko once wrote a book: "Golden Sections. Processes of Self-Organisation and Evolution of Systems . https://disk.yandex.ru/i/6WcY7HpmHuiERQ.

There, among other interesting things, he introduces such a concept as system redundancy. Redundancy of a system is what allows it to resist the environment, i.e. to survive, evolve and exchange energy with the environment in its favour.

The redundancy of the system in this case is the selection of such a number of features that would provide a stable profit. That is, not one qualifying feature, not two or five. But also not a thousand. So, in order to understand how many and what attributes should be selected, it is necessary to understand the essence of the process.

Open any textbook on nonlinear dynamics, - is it simple enough to model any motion?

I myself for about 5 years wasted MA, BB, Keltner channels and so on.

Did you read Rybakov's "The Bronze Bird" as a child? Very instructive book.

[Deleted]  
Inquiring #:

E. Soroko once wrote a book: "Golden Sections. Processes of self-organisation and evolution of systems. https://disk.yandex.ru/i/6WcY7HpmHuiERQ

There, among other interesting things, the concept of system redundancy is introduced. The redundancy of a system is what allows it to resist the environment, i.e. to survive, evolve and exchange energy with the environment in its favour.

The redundancy of the system in this case is the selection of such a number of features that would provide a stable profit. That is, not one qualifying feature, not two or five. But also not a thousand. So, in order to understand how many and what attributes should be selected, it is necessary to understand the essence of the process.

Open any textbook on nonlinear dynamics - is it simple enough to model any movement?

I myself have been wasting MA, BB, Keltner channels, etc. for about 5 years.

Did you read Rybakov's "The Bronze Bird" as a child? Very instructive book.

I don't have time for any fiction, this topic is about MO. I'm not interested in the rest. By the way, there are articles on quantum physics, you can theorise there. The selection of features in MO is solved rather trivially.