The order, timing and potential of the trading process - page 9
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I think you are mistaken. Let us speculate. Suppose there is a balanced triangle as part of the set of currency pairs selected for trading. When trading in a portfolio it will not give anything except for a loss. But in multicurrency trading, when trading is performed independently for each instrument making up the triangle, it may well give a profit.
Bullshit 2
Some children think that portfolio trading implies compulsory opening and closing of orders for all assets at the same time. In reality, portfolio trading involves constant changes in lots, positions and assets.
Well, it will not be a full lock, but a partial overlap, due to this there is a small net volume in the market with a lot of unnecessary costs. The trades are independent, but since there is always a signal from the indicator, and control of the net position is not implemented, these costs are constantly formed.
Now we are getting closer :)
I cannot find the message where it was suggested to cut these unnecessary costs - trading is multicurrency, not portfolio.
Do not be so one-sided. Opposite positions give nothing in terms of profit - that's true. But they don't make a loss (other than the cost of opening and maintaining those positions) - that's their huge impact.
So, yes, they give you nothing but a technical loss, then why do you need them? And that loss is understandable and can be eliminated, unlike market uncertainty. There is no sensible reason to tolerate that in your account.
So, yes, they give you nothing but a technical loss, then why do you need them? And that loss is understandable and can be eliminated, unlike market uncertainty. There is no sensible reason to tolerate it on your account.
In special literature it is called "marrying the position" - the market has turned against you, and it is a pity to close the position, because it is so beautiful...
Delusion 2
Some kids think that portfolio trading is about necessarily opening and closing orders on all assets at the same time. What actually happens in portfolio trading is that lots, positions and assets change all the time.
Which is not the case under discussion, which is why PNB is a multi-currency trade where no lots are created.
- Diversification?
- No, I haven't heard.
Diversification is not about locks/triangles/rings.
Diversification is about not putting all your eggs in one basket.
Delusion 2
Some kids think that portfolio trading is about necessarily opening and closing orders on all assets at the same time. In reality, portfolio trading involves constant changes in lots, positions and assets.
Meli Imelia, your week). Better write what you disagree with: 1)a triangle in portfolio trading will only bring losses, 2)in multi-currency trading a triangle can make money. If you have nothing to say, it's better to remain silent).
Meli Imelia, your week). Better write what you disagree with: 1) a triangle in portfolio trading will only bring losses, 2)in multi-currency trading a triangle can make money. If you have nothing to say, it's better to remain silent).
And how do you prove one of these statements?
Chatter....
In special literature it is called "marrying into a position" - the market has turned against you, and it's a shame to close the position, because it's so beautiful...
But for this there should be a lot of positions. When there are dozens of these positions, one more, one less, you stop noticing.
And how do you prove one of these claims?
Chatter....
)) ++
I get the impression that these guys haven't traded more than one pair. Maybe they don't understand the question or have no spatial reasoning at all?