The future of the Forex industry - page 7

 
SanAlex:

Is it going to be a cycle like this again, with currencies going to jail?

Trade all instruments at the same time - peace and quiet.

 
Yousufkhodja Sultonov:

If traders ignore the PNB, then the Quantum Comp. won't help either.

What else is PNB? is it a cult of some kind? 🤔😁

 
pribludilsa:
One can understand the increased tax on super profits when super corporations grow to the capitals of states. But when I put my whole life to just live decently, to have enough to eat, what the fuck do I owe anyone. They just raised a privileged caste all over the world, who are well established and get money for nothing. They say that the West is supposedly so advanced, just look at the tax schemes, but it is a medieval society that lives off tribute. It's amazing that it still exists in this form. Because it's a proletarian society, they've never run any business themselves, they've just forgotten and go to work like robots. And they are parasitised on them.

This is not quite the right reasoning, because no one specially cultivates any caste, on the contrary, the emergence of social strata of more successful "capitalists" and less successful "proletarians" is a completely natural process, characteristic of any era, and everyone gets according to their real abilities...

Of course, if you take medieval society, there were restrictions in the form of class privileges and this hindered development in general... now there are no such restrictions to fly from the bottom to the top, all depends on the ability of the person, and how it is evaluated by the market - just the extent to which it becomes successful ...

There are 2 categories of people: 1. those who take and do something (or try to) and 2. those who complain about capitalism 😀

Obviously it's harder for a conditional proletarian from a factory to become a capitalist... But that's his personal problem, no one will go his way for him 😀

 
pribludilsa:
If there was a fair and simple tax system. No one would even seek to evade. I don't think people don't understand the need to chip in for a common cause. People evade taxes precisely because it is an unfair and absurd system in most countries.

One cannot disagree with this, the system of unconditional taxation is inherently flawed as it does not allow members of society to vote on what the collected funds will be spent on (only very indirectly through elections) and historically derives from tribute/tribute/obligation/etc

It would be nicer and fairer to replace this tax archaism with a system of paid public services, charging for those public/state goods and in exactly the proportion in which they are used by each member of society, but it's a long way off now 😕🙁

 
Yousufkhodja Sultonov:

Trade all instruments at the same time - peace and quiet.


If one instrument is no good, then all instruments at the same time will add up to the same thing.

 
Evgeniy Chumakov:


If one instrument does no good, it will do the same for all at the same time.

Undoubtedly so

if each component is non-stationary, then any sum of them will also be non-stationary (except the very special cases of cointegration)

though the sum as a portfolio may have locally lower volatility than if you open the whole volume for one instrument

 
pribludilsa:

So taxes are nonsense, pure tribute. When I go to a factory and pay tax, I can understand. The state took part in building the infrastructure there and so on, provides the right, yes, tax. But if you earn money on Forex, what does the state have to do with it? Pure robbery is legalized. I am not against taxes per se, but we need a fair system. Like in the Cayman Islands, a tax in a shop on the price tag. The poor man pays little because he bought the grits. The rich person pays a lot because he bought a Mercedes. Property taxes in general deny the concept of private property. Why should someone pay for a car or a house if he bought it with his own money? Property tax, did they build you a house or not, you built it yourself? The first society that understands that they need a fair tax system, they will win, and offshore companies realize and make a fair and simple system. They will develop.

A fundamentally wrong statement. Taxes are the lifeblood of any state. To live in a state and not pay taxes is impossible. There is a 20/80 law - 20% of the wealthy get richer at the expense of 80% of the rest of society. Ideally, the rich should pay 50% -of their income in tax. We have a flat rate of 13%, which is totally unfair. Developed countries have progressive taxation of up to 60%, which is more or less normal. If we don't pay taxes, we pay revolutionaries. It's a complex and confusing subject and best left untouched.

 
Yousufkhodja Sultonov:

The statement is fundamentally wrong. Taxes are the lifeblood of any state. It is impossible to live in a state and not pay taxes. There is a 20/80 law - 20% of the wealthy get rich at the expense of 80% of the rest of society. Ideally, the rich should pay 50% -of their income in tax. We have a flat rate of 13%, which is totally unfair. Developed countries have progressive taxation of up to 60%, which is more or less normal. If we don't pay taxes, we pay revolutionaries. This is a complex and confusing subject, better left untouched.

The rich should pay more and feed the poor? - but what is the point of that? - It turns out that the losers are stimulated and the successful ones discouraged...

Besides, why should it be the less successful who claim to share the income of the more successful? Is this called justice?

Pareto'slaw of incomedistribution, 80/20, etc. -- not because "capitalists rob ordinary working people" -- but because the more successful people always outnumber the average person and the underdogs.

This alleged equality is a tired Marxist myth that justifies "divide and conquer" ...

The more successful should be rewarded more.

Taxes and blood is a learned archaism, repeated thoughtlessly... People do not even think about the fact that it is possible to do otherwise, while aggressively implemented templates make them fiercely defend "state interests", forgetting that the state is not its own value, and that the only purpose of state association (as well as any society) = increasing the well-being of the united, otherwise the meaning of maintaining this structure? Modern states take too much upon themselves...

And in those countries where taxes go up to 60% - rich people just run away, changing tax residency and/or citizenship (examples are known!) and who got better from it?

 
Evgeniy Chumakov:


If one instrument is no good, it will be the same for all at the same time.

I was referring to the unpredictable volatility of one instrument at the wrong time. By trading many instruments at the same time, the funds curve flattens out, becomes more predictable and easier to take countermeasures. For example, my account did not feel yesterday's spike in volatility on some instruments and quietly increased funds by 1%:.

 
transcendreamer:

What the hell is PNB? is it a cult of some kind? 🤔😁

They are functions of past, present and future tenses describing any process, including currency trading. The P function finds any dependence in a number series if it is present there. The price series is no exception. It turns out that it is not a case of "come, see, win". More or less distinct dependence is found when analyzing a sample of 300 daily bars or 10 000 one-hour bars. The search for the optimal sample continues, but the order is approximately as follows.

Reason: