Suggestions for MQL syntax - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Well, what exactly was there? Last I remember, there was an implicit copy operator that allowed copying dynamic objects, but that's nothing, especially as a lot of time has passed since then.
I haven't kept timekeeping, for example, when did function pointers appear in classes? It doesn't feel older than 2 years. And I said additions are minor, like the above. I'm currently mastering Ninja 8.
This is just a list of everything that is in C++ and what is not in mql. Is there anything left in c++ that is not on the wishlist and not in mql?
This is just a list of everything that is in C++ and what is not in mql. Is there anything in c++ that's not on the wish list and not in mql?
It turns out that maybe we didn't need our own mql language. Maybe, it would be better to write EAs/indicators in C++ from the very beginning?
This small number of people can write libraries that everyone will use.
How many of these libraries are there ?
So far, apart from fxsaber's compatibility library, I can't think of any. That said, the question is - do most of the participants really use it?
I'm currently mastering Ninja 8.
What's the point?
So, maybe we didn't need our own mql language? Maybe it would have been better to initially write EAs/indicators in C++?
I've read about it many times in various traders' blogs.
But I don't see a big problem here - all interfaces with the trade server must be written separately anyway. It does not make much difference which language to use. The good thing about C++ is that many people have a lot of experience in it.
I haven't kept timekeeping, for example, when did function pointers appear in classes? It feels no older than 2 years. And I said additions are minor, like the above. I'm currently mastering Ninja 8.
Functions in classes? You mean static? Because I thought I missed something... I ran to check it on common methods - no, it didn't work)
Well, it seems that pointers to static methods appeared at the same time when the pointers to normal functions, no? This announcement is from April 16, i.e. 2.5 years ago. In principle it is not too far from your sensations. But 2.5 years is not a long period either.
It's just that I may not have used the phrase "in recent years..." I meant the horizon of the last couple of years.
So, maybe we didn't need our own mql language? Maybe it would have been better to initially write EAs/indicators in C++?
Yes, either that or... they could have taken off-the-shelf open source C++ compiler code and with a nifty move of their hand... the trousers turn, turn the trousers... into an elegant MQL that would have everything that C++ has except address arithmetic