A pattern. - page 7
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Not by Fourier, Taylor or other respected citizens; not by dispersion, RMS or some other expected payoff.
Not by Fourier, Taylor and other respected citizens; not by dispersion, RMS or some other expected payoff.
Levels or what?
You're not getting it right.
Not by Fourier, Taylor or other respected citizens; not by dispersion, RMS or some other expectation.
I drink and eat with my head and write programs with my fingers. Ooh.
Hot Estonian guys, that's not what I mean.
Does the false statement "... there are no regularities in the market..." make the true statement "... there are no accidents in the market..."?
There are both regularities in the market, which are clearly seen on history, and accidents, which are probably not random. But it's useless for trading. And the market itself may be not random.
I have already quoted: "In the strong formulation of the law of causality: "if you know the present precisely, you can predict the future", the premise is wrong, not the conclusion. We cannot in principle know the present in all details" W. Heisenberg
In general the question of randomness-causality of the market is irrelevant. And it does not make sense.
I drink and eat with my head and write programs with my fingers. Ooh.
In general, the question of market randomness-lawfulness is irrelevant. Nor does it make sense.
But it is possible to speculate. It will not kill you.
It's all right to speculate. It wouldn't hurt.
That's what we do.)
It's all right to speculate. It won't hurt.
I agree. Randomness is an unknowable pattern...
I agree. Randomness is an unknowable pattern...
what was the post about?
about nothing?
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and strategy testing
Regularity.
Alexei Tarabanov, 2018.05.30 22:23
One does not make money by Fourier, Taylor and other respected citizens transformation; not by variance, RMS or some other expectation.
I agree. Randomness is an unknowable pattern...
Basically an unknowable pattern.) But there's also just randomness, and it's impossible to tell the difference).