here's a new job for $10. Has something changed in the job service ?

 

https://www.mql5.com/ru/job/73683 here's the job itself.

Left a bid for $10 and it worked. Is it back to the old days ?

Фриланс-сервис на MQL5.com: Исправить ошибку уже написанного для торговли BO робота
Фриланс-сервис на MQL5.com: Исправить ошибку уже написанного для торговли BO робота
  • www.mql5.com
В наличии советник для торговли BO у брокера Grand Capital к которому сам попытался прикрутить усреднение, в итоге вышло как то коряво, не видит меджики и неверно считает колени. Необходимо поправить. Сам советник и конкретное описание как правильно должна работать функция пришлю кандидату в приложении. Десятиминутная работа для знающего человека
 
Dmitiry Ananiev:

https://www.mql5.com/ru/job/73683 here's the job itself.

Left a bid for $10 and it worked. Are the old days back?


Nothing has changed: both performers and customers will be punished.

 
Vladimir Karputov:

Nothing has changed: the perpetrators and the client will be punished.

For what? If the service missed, what are the penalties for not knowing???

 
Vladimir Karputov:

Nothing has changed: the perpetrators and the client will be punished.

Vitaly Muzichenko:

For what? If the service missed it, what are the penalties for not knowing???

The application was in the translation category. This is a deliberate circumvention of the minimum cost of software development in the service.

One can assume that out of ignorance.

In any case - the category has already been corrected.

 
Vitaly Muzichenko:

For what? If the service missed, what are the penalties for not knowing???


For deliberately placing the work in the wrong category.

 

Better penalise your freelance programmer. His error or oversight made it possible to put in such prices.

 
Dmitiry Ananiev:

Better penalise your freelance programmer. It was his mistake or oversight that made it possible to put in these prices.


It has already been explained above and twice. You must not think at all. Please read the comments above.

 
Vladimir Karputov:

It's been explained above and twice. You can't just not think at all. Please read the comments above.


In general, you need to be more discreet and not threaten bans left and right. A formal apology would have sufficed.

 
Dmitiry Ananiev:

In general, you should be more restrained than threatening bans left and right. A formal apology would have sufficed.


To you:

  • for finding a violation of posting in an inappropriate category: a "+" and a separate thank you
  • for not wanting to read and understand that there are different CATEGORIES of work: "-"

 
Artyom Trishkin:

The application was in the "Translation" category. This is a deliberate circumvention of the minimum cost of software development in the service.

One can assume that out of ignorance.

In any case - the category is already fixed.


Three things:

1. When I was addressed by customers with the task "to convert from mql4 to mql5", then in each and every case they all wrote: "I need to translate/rewrite an indicator/advisor from mql4 to mql5".

So, if you don't have a hint what is "conversion" and what is "translation" when submitting the request, you will see such requests with wrong category quite often.

2. Carefully read the rules againhttps://www.mql5.com/ru/job/rules and didn't see anything in it saying that for specifying an incorrect category you should [...].

3) As for the style/manner to talk about punishment at the drop of a hat -- especially when the rule is not explicitly written out in the rules -- that is, in a system of governance, such as "Power based on punishment (coercion)".

It doesn't lead to anything good.

 

You have to do the transfer from 30... if you leave a loophole, they're bound to get in)) that's human psychology... punish - don't punish...

Reason: