From theory to practice - page 284

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky:
What's the non-Markovian? Are the observations somehow dependent on the past?
I'll do that tomorrow.
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

All right, the process is non-Markovian, that's what I had to prove !!!

That's it - look at the map and say. Just like Zhukov.)

 
Yuriy Asaulenko:

Just like that - looked at the map and said. Just like Zhukov.)

Oh, that's me, you got that right.

)

 

Yuriy Asaulenko:

...

The real dimension might be smaller, but to get rid of the noise you can't get less. i.e., you need at least 15 points of history to determine the current state.

Two points have always been enough. (And there is no "noise" in the markets. Even on ticks)

 
Renat Akhtyamov:
I'll do that tomorrow.

What to do?

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky:

what to do?

keep reading the literature

something from the turkey will come in handy

and build a system.
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

keep reading the literature.

something from turkey will come in handy

and a system to build a system

You should first find out what a Gaussian Markov process is, for example, so you don't write such bloopers about non-markovianity.)

 
Maxim Dmitrievsky:

You should first find out what a Gaussian Markov process is, for example, so that you don't write such bloopers about non-markovianity again.)

If it were Markovian, you'd have gone the other way.
 
Renat Akhtyamov:
If you were a Markovian, you would have gone the other way.

God, you're so shallow after all. I could say that a hundred times over.

 

Mikhail showed Maxim who is the boss in the MoD thread, and now he's moved from there to here ))))

That's it, the thread has been torn down, there will only be trolling here from now on.

Reason: