From theory to practice - page 420

New comment
 
Renat Akhtyamov:

No, it's not because of that

if you remove the trend from the quotient (i.e. limit it to the analysis of increments over time x), it is this trend that takes you into minus

And vice versa: if you take a flat off the cotier, then it is this flat...

)

It's not even that, it's the lack of a systematic approach. There is no substitute for over-allocation).
Also, there is no clear testing. It gives no guarantees, but allows us to see obvious problems of the system.
Well, and some maximalism).
 
Alexander_K2:

Confusing I'm going to make the most shameful EURUSD trade all the readers of this thread. I'll keep it to myself. Like a diary.

...

Here we are, here we are.

You're the only one writing nonsense, catching a spherical horse in a vacuum.

That's why no one responds.

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

Your programme is blind


Agreed. Through experimental and practical data, I was able to obtain the following table for the trend/flat parameter:

1. Hurst parameter - no.

2. Pearson asymmetry coefficient - no

3. nonentropy - ?

4. incremental velocity - ?

So far I work without this key parameter at all - I'm just gathering statistics.

 
Nikolay Demko:

Is there a universal forum that divides data into trend/fleet? (in real time without delays, not on history)

With such a formula, it's like sending two bytes of money.

K2's got some kind of formula for a flat, looks like it.

The rest is probably trending.

but there's no way to trade it,

I have no idea what to do with it.

 
Yuriy Asaulenko:
It's not even that, it's the lack of a systematic approach. There is no substitute for brute force distributions).
Also, there is no coherent testing. No guarantees, but allows you to see obvious problems with the system.
Well, and some maximalism).

Uh-huh

But it's funny.

 
Nikolay Demko:

Here we are, here we are.


Thank you, Nikolai.

Heartfelt. From the heart, as they say.

 
Alexander_K2:

Agreed. Through experimental and practical data, the following table was obtained for the trend/flat parameter:

1. Hurst parameter - no.

2. Pearson asymmetry coefficient - no

3. nonentropy - ?

4. incremental velocity - ?

So far, I work without this key parameter - I'm just gathering statistics.

It's good if you can find it.

but wouldn't it be easier to look at the supply/demand ratio?

the answer is no, it's not.

but maybe

 
Renat Akhtyamov:

but isn't it easier to look at the supply/demand ratio


Still, do you think OI?

 
Alexander_K2:

Still, do you think the OI?

Among other things.

Take the information from wherever you can, check it out.

Predictions and implications just get bogged down in the discussion on this topic
 
Alexander_K2:

Do you think it's the OI after all?

Where would an AI come from in the forex market? Enlighten me.
1...413414415416417418419420421422423424425426427...1981
New comment
Reason: