Selling the Philosopher's Stone - page 2

 
Alexey Volchanskiy:

I have not seen a single stable working trader ))


And our Kozak Taras? What is wrong with him?

He gave a lot of people a good run for their money. And he made a few hundred million himself.

 
Mickey Moose:

What about the self-assertion element - to go to some forum and announce publicly that you have caught such a huge candle on the news, with a screenshot, where the black timeframe is 1 minute and other delights.

 
Alexander Filippov:
For self-assertion there is a stable business, and it is like fishing, you catch well, you don't catch, you get some fresh air
 
Alexander Filippov:
There is a stable business for self-affirmation, and it is like fishing, you catch well, you do not catch, take a breath of fresh air

Thank you for reminding me, you made a deal, you made a profit, you come out on the forum and there is this reaction.

The same as with the philosopher's stone, like look, here it is, the stone of my dreams, and you will not give it to me.

 

didn't catch it - drained part of the deposit... And left muttering...

There's no fresh air here )))) hee-hee-hee

 
Mickey Moose:

Thank you for reminding me, you made a deal, you made a profit, you come out on the forum and there is this reaction.

Just like with the Philosopher's Stone, like look, here it is, the stone of my dreams, but I won't give it to you.


Many times I've seen fishermen in suits from Armani, with sophisticated rods:))) and a peasant with a walnut rod:))) and sit Armani change the bait, and the peasant pulls one after the other:)))) is what I mean, I know that I do not know the slogan for all time. All the guru's are a hobgoblin.

 
Ibragim Dzhanaev:

Here is a test of the algorithm as intended (without optimisation).



Smudged lots on the chart?


Alexander Filippov:

Many times have seen razfufunkrovannye fishermen in suits from Armani, with fancy rods:))) and near collective farmer with a walnut rod:))) and sit Armani bait change, and collective farmer pulls one for one:))) is what I mean, I know that I do not know anything slogan for all time. All the gurus are fools.


that's pretty much it.

 
Mickey Moose:

the lots smeared over the schedule?



Well, that's pretty much it.


Changed my mind.

 
Alexander Ivanov:

And our kozak Taras? What's wrong with him?

He gave a lot of people a good income. And he earned a few hundred million himself.

Wer ist das Taras?
 
Alexey Volchanskiy:
I have no idea why.

Just arithmetic, and I'm afraid it's not for the better...

12 months, VDS maintenance costs (or whatever the fuck the home computer + communication costs) + personal time costs (time-money). If you can't cover all that with profit, your robot is at a disadvantage.

So it turns out that a single expenditure of 1K $ (500 per account, 500 including organizational costs) at 100% profitability of the robot turns out 0.

You may explain why, but everyone forgets that nothing should be done for free :-) exploitation of a robot requires resources