Has anyone created a net advisor that is good and does not leak? - page 6
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Then there would be white noise.
And there is. The point is that a "pure" gridiron (without history-optimised parameters) should, in theory, work on any pair. Does it make sense? Then try to superimpose the charts of all pairs on the same timeframe. You will get exactly white noise.
Grid scalpers usually have problems with hanging losing orders. I have a net scalper, but the grid is virtual. I have not yet completely solved this problem on the machine.
And it does. The point is that a "pure" gridiron (without history-optimised parameters) should, in theory, work on any pair. Is it logical? Then try to superimpose the charts of all pairs on the same timeframe. You will get exactly white noise.
I disagree here, it's not like we are trading synthetic of all pairs, but individually each has its own behaviour.
I also did not find any universal solution for cutting off losses. The pair may correct in 1 or 10 figures (like at Brexit).
So far I've only thought about locking on some range + something else with MM.
I believe that using a gridiron with constant lot build-up in the direction of the trend in a reversal strategy has an advantage compared to the variant where a single order is opened instead of a gridiron. I am now rather successfully practicing this variant of semi-automatic trading. The advantage is that we do not enter the market with a full lot at once but gradually increase the total lot. It is as if the price itself opens a new order only if there is a trend in its direction. First, it is sort of an additional filter of trade direction correctness; second, in case the price reverses and the aggregate position has not yet breakeven, the aggregate position's lot is usually not big yet and it will be easier to profit from the opposite grid with the larger lot.
I believe that using a gridiron with constant lot build-up in the direction of the trend in a reversal strategy has an advantage compared to the variant where a single order is opened instead of a gridiron. I am now rather successfully practicing this variant of semi-automatic trading. The advantage is that we do not enter the market with a full lot at once but gradually increase the total lot. It is as if the price itself opens a new order only if there is a trend in its direction. First, it is sort of an additional filter of trade direction correctness; second, in case of price reversal if the aggregate position has not yet breakeven, the aggregate position's lot is usually not big yet and it will be easier to profit from the opposite grid with a larger lot.
This is what I do, though I develop dynamic lot changes on the move. By the way, it is physically impossible to trade with the hand. Greetings to the hand traders ))
That's what I do, although I develop dynamic lot changes on the move. By the way, it is physically impossible to trade by hand. Greetings to the hand traders ))
I have tested one of my projects, nettool, only grid step size. It is a dumb grid without any indicator filters and the like, always in the market. I've tried it since January till now, my spread is 30 pips (5 digits for those who don't know), I haven't optimized the instrument GBPUSD, just ran it like in the tester, I used it to test some ideas, I didn't use it for trading.
best regards.
the inputs on a dime?
coin entries?
With respect.