Pirat! How do you get this "grail" to be profitable? And most importantly WHERE? - page 7

 

With such aggressive work (2-5 trades a day) NDB server cannot cope with processing pending orders. As a result, the Expert Advisor freezes (cannot do anything, including trawling) and the trade is closed at Take Profit.

 
joo:

...

Catch, ...

probably a fake office.
 
The question is not so much the choice of broker, but rather the choice of parameters and additional "whistles" with which this owl will work in this brokerage house. Alpari is, after all, one of the leading internet trading companies in Russia.
 
adept:
probably a fake office.
So don't catch it.
 
The Expert Advisor does not take into account an important, but nevertheless relevant factor - the rsi should be of different periods - longer and shorter.
 
YOUNGA:
The Expert Advisor does not take into account an important, but nevertheless relevant factor - the rsi should be of different periods - longer and shorter.
It does not make sense to use RSI of different period on the same timeframe, because one will always overlap the other. What signals should there be then?
 
Well, how can I say - in a trend, you have to work with a trend (but I do not insist - in the description of the Expert Advisor there is a phrase - ...on the RSI indicators with different periods...probably a band filter) Maybe the Swinosaurs take an RSI of some kind. But the very subject of pips is interesting to me
 
YOUNGA:
Well, how can I say - in a trend to work on the trend (but I do not insist - in the description of the EA there is a phrase - ...on the RSI indicators with different periods...probably a band filter) Maybe the Swinosaurs take some RSI. But the very subject of pips is interesting to me

scalping is nice for the stock market

 
EvgeTrofi:

Why did you take the price PRICE_CLOSE for the RSI indicator and PRICE_TYPICAL for the CCI?

If I rewrite the conditions as follows: the logic will not change? (it looks better)

if(RSI1 > 100-RSILevel && RSI2 > 100-RSILevel && CCI1 > CCILevel && CCI2 > CCILevel)
      {
      Signal=OP_SELL;
      }
   if(RSI1 < RSILevel && RSI2 < RSILevel && CCI1 < -CCILevel && CCI2 < -CCILevel)
      {
      Signal=OP_BUY;
      }

 
vgeny:

Why did you take the price PRICE_CLOSE for the RSI indicator and PRICE_TYPICAL for the CCI?

If I rewrite the conditions as follows: the logic will not change? (it looks better)

And you won't add a second RSi?