MT5 and trans2quik.dll - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
And the library for giving orders to the Quicksilver is a success?
There's nothing complicated there, there's an API to the library.
Added
And the order giving has not come to the point, because there is no
arbitration situation (DiffLong or DiffShort) should be at least 5 points positive.
For 10 days of round-the-clock testing, an arbitrage situation has never developed
values are always negative :(
Bringing up the subject....
I want to link MT5 and Quik again
The task is
To receive data from MT5 to transmit it to OWN application which will give orders to Quik via trans2quik dll and control positions.
will give orders to Quik, through trans2quik.dll and control positions.
Question:
What's the best way to implement data transfer from MT5 to my application?
Bringing up the subject....
I want to link MT5 and Quik again
The task is
To receive data from MT5 to transmit it to OWN application which will give orders to Quik via trans2quik dll and control positions.
will give orders to Quik, through trans2quik.dll and control positions.
Question:
What's the best way to implement the data from MT5 to my own application?
I don't understand why you're making such a fuss and why you don't like Lua. We go from Lua to DLL, and from DLL to the application.
Regarding data transport. Here's what I do.
We form the data in the terminal into CSV strings in char format. Chars array is sent to the DLL and the DLL sends it to the application with TCP server. The same TCP channel is used to send chars back to the terminal.
The performance of this channel is >1.5 GB/s including data conversion to and from strings.
I don't understand why you're making such a fuss and why you don't like Lua. From Lua we go to the DLL, and from the DLL to the app.
Regarding data transport. This is what I do.
We form the data in the terminal into CSV strings in char format. Chars array is sent to the DLL and the DLL sends it to the application with TCP server. The same TCP channel is used to send chars back to the terminal.
The speed of such a channel is >1.5 GB/s and includes data conversion into strings and vice versa.
Yuri, by any chance had any experience of docking .NET DLL on Sharp with Lua? Very much needed.
On sharpe, there wasn't. But the use of NET in native DLLs is there. Say, the same TCP client - NET library Sockets. It is written in mixed code C++. If you need an instance, the DLL TCP-client docked to the Lua can give.
On sharpe, there wasn't. But the use of NET in native DLLs is there. Say, the same TCP client - NET library Sockets. It is written in mixed code C++. If you need an instance, I can give you the TCP-client DLL docked with Lua.
If not difficult - not to re-invent the wheel unnecessarily)
If it's not too difficult - so as not to reinvent the wheel unnecessarily)
Email me so that I can remember. I don't think I can do it today, tomorrow or the day after tomorrow I'll scrape together some stuff, make sure it works and send it to you.
But DLL is C++, not Sharp.
https://quikluacsharp.ru/stati-uchastnikov/otsylka-tranzaktsij-iz-s-bez-ispolzovaniya-lua-koda/
I don't understand why you're making such a fuss and why you don't like Lua. From Lua we go to the DLL, and from the DLL to the app.
Regarding data transport. This is what I do.
We form the data in the terminal into CSV strings in char format. Chars array is sent to the DLL and the DLL sends it to the application with TCP server. The same TCP channel is used to send chars back to the terminal.
The speed of such a channel is >1.5 GB/s, including conversion of data into strings and vice versa.
1. And then there's the fact that you can't properly test a robot in Lua.
2. MT5 gets quotes much faster1. and then because you can't properly test a robot in lua.
2. MT5 is much faster in getting quotes1. I use my own tester. Very uncomplicated design.
2. I read some years ago that Quick is a bit delayed in displaying charts, in order to minimize the delay of quotes.
In general, the performance of Quick and Quick-Loop is enough for scalping and working with stack and strip. But if you need more speed, you are probably right.