Registration for the Real Accounts (Cents) Championship July 2017 . - page 18

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and trading strategy testing
Registration for the Real Accounts (Cents) Championship July 2017 .
Sergey Gritsay, 2017.05.13 19:20
Hi all! at my leisure I have sketched out a rating calculation in excel, I am waiting for comments.Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing trading strategies
Registration for the Real Accounts (Cents) Championship July 2017 .
Sergey Gritsay, 2017.05.14 15:32
I've been doing a little more work on the rating and this is what I've come up withthere is no switch.
I don't do that in signals, not because I don't have an averaging advisor (so it's like I get greedy), but because my conscience won't let me do that.
So you think you're the only light in the darkness of the averagers...
Don't be silly.
that was a rejoinder to dirty.
be specific please. what did i say wrong about leverage, drawdowns, sharpe? what of all this has nothing to do with reality and those who like big leverage and stop out instead of SL?
and even more specifically - what's the problem with scoring big on your system in a competition? what exactly is the problem? it's not the sharpe that's the problem, is it?
So you think you're the only light in the darkness of the averages...
Don't be silly.
be more specific, please. what did i say wrong about leverage, drawdowns, sharpe? what of all this has nothing to do with reality and with those who like big leverage and stop out instead of SL?
and even more specifically, what is the problem with scoring big on your system in a competition? what exactly is the problem? it's not the sharpe that's the problem, is it?
You know exactly what I'm talking about. But you're trying to shut it down... a familiar tactic... On that leash ("be specific, please") I'm not going.
why one? not one. but you're certainly not one of them.
That's good.
All indicators in the formula have an equal weighting factor, this is fraught with irrational distortions, and you shouldn't take more than 3 indicators for the same reason.
In my humble opinion, we should replace the current formula for calculating the sharps score with a recovery factor and it will be fine.
You know exactly what I'm talking about. But you're trying to shut me down... a familiar tactic... I'm not going on this leash.
Sorry if I hit a nerve, sorry if pointing fingers at reality hurts you.
I apologize purely out of politeness, because it's not my fault you have a bitter reality. just please don't freak out and break the keyboard and monitor, they are not to blame for anything, besides, if you change something in your trade you have to change them too.
I'm sorry if I hit a nerve, sorry if pointing fingers at reality hurts you.
I apologize purely out of politeness, because it's not my fault you have a bitter reality.
You're not much of a wit.
all indicators in the formula have equal weighting factor, this is fraught with irrational distortions, in addition, we should not take more than 3 indicators for the same reason.
In my humble opinion, we should replace the current sharps score formula with a recovery factor and we'll be fine.
Members - what do you think of Andrei's suggestion?