Taking a loan? Yes, yes, for forex
You take out a loan at ~15% per annum. You invest in the most profitable Signal, or PAMM, or portfolio, or trade yourself and... voila! You count the stars, lying on a yacht at sunset with a beautiful woman to the music of Leningrad. Many here will not attach importance to such an act, but rather resent the choice of music on the yacht.
But seriously, is there any point in doing so? Has anyone done something like this? After all, most here suffer from having budget deposits, which, God forbid, at 30% a month is a tedious task and a new plasma full-wall won't provide immediately.
- Search for investors.
- Trader's club?
- From theory to practice
Ivan Butko:
You take out a loan at ~15% per annum. You invest in the most profitable Signal, or PAMM, or portfolio, or trade yourself and... voila! You count the stars, lying on a yacht at sunset with a beautiful woman to the music of Leningrad. Many here will not attach importance to such an act, but rather resent the choice of music on the yacht.
But seriously, is there any point in doing so? Has anyone done something like this? After all, most here suffer from having budget deposits that run up at, God forbid, 30% a month is a tedious thing to do.
Interest on such loans in the thousands of dollars - is fantastic )))).
And in the case of a drain (no one is immune from this) - a kidney to sell?
Vitalie Postolache:
Honestly, I've never taken out a loan at all, so slooow. Googled 'interest on loan bank', came up on the first lines )))
Interest rates like that on loans of thousands of dollars are fantastic ))))
Ivan Butko:
Honestly, I've never taken out a loan at all, so slooow. I googled "interest on a bank loan" and came up with the first few lines ))))
For a loan advertisement they might say 15% but when you do the math it turns out that you have to pay back the full 30% or even 100% ;)
Honestly, I've never taken out a loan at all, so slooow. I googled "interest on a bank loan" and came up with the first few lines ))))
Vitalie Postolache:
They may advertise the loan at 15% but when they calculate the repayment it turns out that they have to pay back all 30% ;)
This is the annual interest rate, isn't it? And if this entire sum is "spent" in the project with 120% per annum (very low-profit in relation to Forex, and hence - and low-risk, and I am not talking about our top managers), then even if it is 50%, it will still be possible to profit, if you seriously engage in selection of the lender and manager. And if you are able to trade? That would be great. So I was wondering if anyone has tried it? The most stable traders talk about bans on credit, which is paradoxical. In one well-known forex academy, the name begins with "Masterfo....", the teachers have shown me the results of the best traders and their own too. No drawdowns for a long period. And everybody says in a loud voice: "No credits!". I don't get it.
They may advertise the loan at 15% but when they calculate the repayment it turns out that they have to pay back all 30% ;)
Ivan Butko:
Take it and do not think, you will be like Taras! The main thing is to take a bigger amount, the more you take, the more you may earn.
You take out a loan at ~15% per annum. You invest in the most profitable Signal, or PAMM, or portfolio, or trade yourself and... voila! You count the stars, lying on a yacht at sunset with a beautiful woman to the music of Leningrad. Many here will not attach importance to such an act, but rather resent the choice of music on the yacht.
But seriously, is there any point in doing so? Has anyone done something like this? After all, most here suffer from having budget deposits, the unwinding of which, God forbid, at 30% a month is a tedious task.
Evgeny Belyaev:
Take it and do not think, you will be like Taras! The main thing is to take a bigger amount, the more you take, the more you'll earn.
Whoa! I tried to laugh, but it was either too late or it didn't really sink in.
Take it and do not think, you will be like Taras! The main thing is to take a bigger amount, the more you take, the more you'll earn.
By the way, Taras!
That is, an investor, according to most, should invest in Taras, because the guy has been trading steadily for a long time and deservedly (this is the word most popular here in relation to our top) has privileges over the attention of subscribers. Couldn't agree more, I want to diversify and invest in our top myself.
But! As soon as it came to credit - "You what!!! Taras is going to sell him out! And if he does, then all the subscribers' money! For how else can you drain a million without draining the subscribers' money!"
That's the aspect that's a bit surprising.
That is, an investor, according to most, should invest in Taras, because the guy has been trading steadily for a long time and deservedly (this is the word most popular here in relation to our top) has privileges over the attention of subscribers. Couldn't agree more, I want to diversify and invest in our top myself.
But! As soon as it came to credit - "You what!!! Taras is going to sell him out! And if he does, then all the subscribers' money! For how else can you drain a million without draining the subscribers' money!"
That's the aspect that's a bit surprising.
Ivan Butko:
These are annuals, aren't they? And if this entire sum is "spent" in a project with 120% per annum (very low-profit in relation to forex, and therefore - low-risk, and I am not talking about our top managers), then even if it is 50%, it will still be possible to profit, if you seriously engage in the selection of both the lender and the manager. And if you are able to trade? That would be great. I was wondering if anyone has tried it? The most stable traders talk about bans on credit, which is paradoxical. In one well-known forex academy, the name begins with "Masterfo....", the teachers have shown me the results of the best traders and their own too. No drawdowns for a long period. And everyone says in a loud voice: "No credits!". I don't get it.
There is a loan calculator on the bank's website. Of course, if you take a loan for just one year then the overpayment for it will be approximately equal to the stated annual. That is, roughly for a million rubles at 15% in the end the bank will have to pay 1150000 + / a dozen or two thousand, approximately 96k rubles per month if equal parts to pay. Where will I get so much money in the first months if my salary is say 40k? Forex may bring 120-300% in a year, even a kind DC will pay them without any problems, but it's a year later, and until then the collectors will take them to organs.
These are annuals, aren't they? And if this entire sum is "spent" in a project with 120% per annum (very low-profit in relation to forex, and therefore - low-risk, and I am not talking about our top managers), then even if it is 50%, it will still be possible to profit, if you seriously engage in the selection of both the lender and the manager. And if you are able to trade? That would be great. I was wondering if anyone has tried it? The most stable traders talk about bans on credit, which is paradoxical. In one well-known forex academy, the name begins with "Masterfo....", the teachers have shown me the results of the best traders and their own too. No drawdowns for a long period. And everyone says in a loud voice: "No credits!". I don't get it.
Vitalie Postolache:
And until then, the collectors will take it apart for organs.
And until then, the collectors will take it apart for organs.
xD)))
Argument
I see, apart from the basic default risk (the amount is like wow), the weighty risk is unstable profits by month.
Again, if you get 30% per month, you can also break it down into the following months, which diversifies the collectors' calls.
And if you take out a loan that you don't have to pay back with your salary (much less than six figures), the loan amount will work for you (in the account of our top)
In general, you want adrenaline, not enough thrill - take a loan for forex. Better yet, go straight to the casino, the thrill increases by orders of magnitude ))))
