Boeing747: The real work starts at about 50 k$. Yes ... that's what he meant. No sense to spend a couple of hundred bucks on the account.
No. Read more of their literature. For them (by their definition), it's a small (starter, warm-up) account size. The real, working account starts at about $50k.
If you do not know the difference between the two types of accounts, you may ask them to open a 100$ account and use 2,000 leverage. :-)
tara: Well, as soon as you built four versions within a week and achieved a different concept, all hope is not lost :)
There are no more options and will never be, 100%.
I made this EA a couple of years ago, but at first I didn't understand the point of it, because there was no output either in minus or plus (thanks to spider, for having hurt my ambitions about zero drawdown. I didn't believe it and remembered I had such a trick). now I have created two indicators for it (one makes all calculations, the other draws equity on it) and I immediately understood everything. gr-gr-gr-gr-.....!
No. Read more of their literature. For them (by their definition), it's a small (start-up, warm-up) account size. In reality, a working account starts at around $50k.
Apparently, there's no kitchens where you can trade on margin, opening 100$ account with 2000$ leverage. :-)
Roman, of course you're right. They understand slightly how and with what they should enter the trades not to lose. But we work on a different principle.
_new-rena: Roman, of course you're right. They slightly understand how and with what to enter the bidding, so as not to lose. But we work on a different principle.
:-) I see.
And 2 All:
Look at these guys: one, two - do not count for advertising. And also from the branch - "Trees don't grow to the sky".
Apparently - possible - that's to the branch's sabre!
There are no more options and will never be, 100%.
I made this advisor a couple of years ago, but at first I didn't understand its meaning, because there is no output either in minus or in plus (thanks to paukas for hurting my ambitions about zero drawdown. I didn't believe it and remembered that I had such a trick). now I have made two indicators for it (one does all calculations, the second draws equities on it) and I immediately understood everything. gr-gr-gr-gr-.....!
One thing I don't understand, if the strategy has no drawdown, the STOPs won't work anyway. Why not put them as an extra safety net, laziness or is it for cowards?
It's not very interesting :)
I agree - it's an absolute bore.
There's nothing left to learn...
The real work starts at about 50 k$. Yes ... that's what he meant. No sense to spend a couple of hundred bucks on the account.
No. Read more of their literature. For them (by their definition), it's a small (starter, warm-up) account size. The real, working account starts at about $50k.
If you do not know the difference between the two types of accounts, you may ask them to open a 100$ account and use 2,000 leverage. :-)
Well, as soon as you built four versions within a week and achieved a different concept, all hope is not lost :)
There are no more options and will never be, 100%.
I made this EA a couple of years ago, but at first I didn't understand the point of it, because there was no output either in minus or plus (thanks to spider, for having hurt my ambitions about zero drawdown. I didn't believe it and remembered I had such a trick). now I have created two indicators for it (one makes all calculations, the other draws equity on it) and I immediately understood everything. gr-gr-gr-gr-.....!
No. Read more of their literature. For them (by their definition), it's a small (start-up, warm-up) account size. In reality, a working account starts at around $50k.
Apparently, there's no kitchens where you can trade on margin, opening 100$ account with 2000$ leverage. :-)
Roman, of course you're right. They slightly understand how and with what to enter the bidding, so as not to lose. But we work on a different principle.
:-) I see.
And 2 All:
Look at these guys: one, two - do not count for advertising. And also from the branch - "Trees don't grow to the sky".
Apparently - possible - that's to the branch's sabre!
Get ready, gentlemen.
Tomorrow the markets will collapse!
There are no more options and will never be, 100%.
I made this advisor a couple of years ago, but at first I didn't understand its meaning, because there is no output either in minus or in plus (thanks to paukas for hurting my ambitions about zero drawdown. I didn't believe it and remembered that I had such a trick). now I have made two indicators for it (one does all calculations, the second draws equities on it) and I immediately understood everything. gr-gr-gr-gr-.....!
One thing I don't understand, if the strategy has no drawdown, the STOPs won't work anyway. Why not put them as an extra safety net, laziness or is it for cowards?