
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There is another theory.
Robert Bartini probably wasn't very good at physics and billiards or simplified the scheme.
Well you don't have to write outright nonsense...
===========================================
You can find a lot of interesting information on the internet about Bartini's achievements.
.
For a first glimpse at least look at the wiki:
Robert (Roberto) Bartini (real name Roberto Oros di Bartini; 14 May 1897, Fiume, Austria-Hungary - 6 December 1974, Moscow) - Italian aristocrat (born in the family of a baron), a communist, who left fascist Italy in the USSR, where he became a famous aircraft designer. Physicist, creator of designs of vehicles based on new principles (see screen-plane). The author of over 60 completed aircraft designs. Kombrig[1]. In the "nationality" column of the questionnaire he wrote: "Russian"[1].Cyclical development
What is that dashed line you have drawn? Is it an inevitable return to zero point? Is it degradation?
You don't have to write outright nonsense...
Oleg, don't be offended. It was such a joke on the contrast. Who doesn't know Bartini?! Especially not his diagram. You just posted the ad.
The diagram is left-handed, that's for sure. And the dimensional chart, that's a good one. I've seen it before, but maybe I underestimated it. At least I enjoyed digging through it again. Discovered a new facet, so to speak. :)
Here is another link to an article with the same table. MODELING OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS
The diagram is left-handed, that's for sure. And the dimensional chart, that's a good one. I have seen it before, but may have underestimated it. At least I re-did it with pleasure. Discovered a new facet, so to speak. :)
Here is another link to an article with the same table. MODELING OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS
Although I have seen it before, I could not appreciate it due to lack of knowledge. Knowledge has increased -- and some facets have opened up.
This is the realisation of the cyclical process of knowledge development.
Although I have seen it before, I could not appreciate it for lack of knowledge. Knowledge has increased -- and some facets have opened up.
This is the realisation of the cyclical process of knowledge development.
Oh, thank you. What would I do without your explanation...
;)
Oh, thank you. What would I do without your explanation...
;)
Yeah, well, that explanation isn't really addressed to you.
;)
Yeah, well, that explanation isn't really addressed to you.
;)
So what. Your "cyclical development chart" is left-handed anyway. Lefty-lefty. Very superficial "punditry on the subject." // I mean the diagram.
;)
And Bartini's chart is a very sensible way of structuring it.So what. Your "cyclic development diagram" is left-handed anyway. Lefty-lefty. Very superficial "musings on the subject." // I mean the diagram.
;)
And Bartini's chart is a very sensible way of structuring it.What the hell with the chart...
And Bartini's table is not just a sensible way of structuring. It is much more than that. It contains the marked cells in which the known laws of nature are arranged. And it also contains cells - white spots, vacancies. Thus, Bartini's table can be globally considered as a program for the development of physics.
What the hell with it, the diagram...
And Bartini's table is not just a sensible way of structuring. It is much more than that. It contains the marked cells in which the known laws of nature are arranged. And it also contains cells - white spots, vacancies. So Bartini's table can be globally seen as a program for physics.