You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The confusion is a consequence of misunderstanding, I understand myself, talking about simple things in highly generalised terms, while changing the subject of my posts 2 times on purpose))
Have fun ;)))
acceleration is the rate of change in velocity.
It's almost an acceleration rate :-))
velocity = s / t; (linear speed)
velocity speed = acceleration = s / t^2; (square velocity)
acceleration speed = acceleration speed = s / t^3; (cubic speed)
acceleration speed = s / t^4; (quadratic speed)
acceleration speed acceleration = s / t^5; (penta-velocity)
...
I suggest you broaden your mind.
And take an interest in the life, activities, results, ideas of Robert Bartini.
.
Bartini's chart.
.
.
.
.
Cyclical development
Cyclical development
Sorry, only two points are reflected by the laws of physics! The others are not! :( ;)
Apparently, the more advanced physicists need to clarify --- this is NOT billiards!
Apparently, especially advanced physics experts need to clarify --- this is NOT billiards!
There is another theory.
Perhaps Robert Bartini was not very good at physics and billiards or simplified the diagram.
Actually it is not a circle, but a complex closed curve which has a tangent at the points of incidence/reflection, the perpendicular of which, drawn through the point of contact with the circle, is the bisector of the sum of the angles of incidence and reflection.
Otherwise a cyclic development is not possible. In any case it cannot even be a hypothesis!
There is another theory.
Perhaps Robert Bartini was not very good at physics and billiards or simplified the diagram.
Actually it is not a circle, but a complex closed curve which has a tangent at the points of incidence/reflection, the perpendicular of which, drawn through the point of contact with the circle, is the bisector of the sum of the angles of incidence and reflection.
Otherwise a cyclic development is not possible. In any case it cannot even be a hypothesis!
This picture is not of Bartini.
This picture is only a figurative representation of the cyclical process of knowledge development.
Look at this picture as a projection on the base plane of the movement along the surface of a cylinder, i.e. along a spiral in three-dimensional space.
However, this is getting a little too complicated... If even the definition of speed from the physics handbook here causes a lot of outrage, protests, and demands to be closer to the people!
;))))
However, this is getting a little too complicated... If even the definition of speed from the physics handbook here causes a lot of outrage, protests, and demands to be closer to the people!
;))))