For those who like to measure... achievements))) - page 27

 
_new-rena:
OK! Get then with a depo of 2,800 a trade with a profit of 57,000....

And a loss of 1134096.82 is hard to get from 2800.
 
YOUNGA:

And the loss is 1134096.82 and it's hard to get a loss of 2800.
That's why the relative drawdown is big.
 
The logic of the strategy allows you to work with a fixed lot, that's what I'm getting at...? (Regards and respect)
 
YOUNGA:
the logic of the strategy allows you to work with a constant lot, that's what I'm getting at...?
no. The lot is not constant. It cannot be, in fact, because sometimes it is more likely to do something (buy/sell) and sometimes less so.... And even more so used reinvestment...
 
strange, that's what martingale practitioners usually say... After all, a profitable strategy is the sum of profitable strategies (entries). That is, if inputs are independent of the result of previous trades, it should be easy to test
 
YOUNGA:
strange, that's what martingale practitioners usually say... After all, a profitable strategy is the sum of profitable strategies (entries). That is, if entries are independent of the result of previous trades, it should be easy to test
martini has an absolutely different depo growth in % for the same period. Reinvesting for a martini is a visit to Uncle Kohl's house.
 
well, then can we do the test without reinvesting?
 

I my option $2,800


 
I don't have much of a deal
 
YOUNGA:
I don't have much of a deal.

I don't know. It looks good without it.

Any stops?

Reason: