[ARCHIVE]Any rookie question, so as not to clutter up the forum. Professionals, don't pass it by. Can't go anywhere without you - 5. - page 379
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
It works, in the sense that one function is executed at one point in time, but the order is not respected.
The alternation is not guaranteed in any language.
You have to, otherwise it will suck. Not for all languages, where code execution is kind of stuck until the queue comes up, in which case the queue will be respected. Here we skip execution until next start call.
Thank you!!!
I don't get it... I guess that's what I asked, not at all horny!
My function stores everything in an array (like a Double) and outputs the sum of the profit also as a Double.
And I need an integer type number in some cases. What's the best way to do it?
My function stores everything in an array (like a dowble) and outputs the sum of the profit as a dowble.
And I need an integer type number in some cases. What's the best way to do it?
I thought the answer was
My function stores everything in an array (like a Double) and outputs the sum of the profit also as a Double.
And I need an integer type number in some cases. What's the best way to do it?
The Expert Advisor only analyses the pair on which it is hovering. On which pair the signal appears first, it opens an order. But sometimes a signal appears on two pairs at the same time. And, strange as it may seem, 2 orders are opened, though there is a check in the Expert Advisor for each open order and it should not open the second one. This is necessary because we have not enough money on the deposit.
Yes, but when the 1st one finishes a job and opens an order, the 2nd one, having started the job, does not see for a while that there is already an order. Or he gets to work before the order opens.
--
One more thing: when the 1st EA has Sleep(1000), does the 2nd EA wait or start working?
Well, I have tried to find out the truth in the forum. - They talked a lot, but did not come to a consensus. No one gave an answer to the burning question. So, sorry, we don't know anything. : )) - Everybody does what they can.
Although. It's a worldly advice to use one Expert Advisor for the time being. If it's any consolation. It has saved me so far.
You have to, otherwise it's bullshit. Not for all languages, there are some places where code execution gets stuck until the queue comes up, in which case the queue will be respected. Here we skip execution until the next start call.
It doesn't depend on the language. Therefore it is not guaranteed. Richter has it written.
If there is no function in the language, the language is there to make it. In any case, it is possible to provide a guaranteed sequence, it depends on the programmer, and how it will be done depends on the language.
If there is no function in the language, the language is there to make it. In any case, it is possible to provide a guaranteed queue, it is up to the programmer, and how this is done depends on the language.