from Bears - page 2

New comment
 
Integer:

But being democratic is not the same as being objective.

Democratism is the average (MA), in trading terms. And the average is really not always objective :)
 
DmitriyN:
Democratism is the average (MA), in trading parlance. And the average is really not always objective :)

No, it's not. Democracy does not require objectivity. Ahem)) so does a dictatorship.
 

You just can't get enough, can you?

Looking at you, you realize that a ban won't help here, and you need to collect all your posts from the smoking room and send them to the prosecutor's office and wash up there. And before you get summoned, open a thread on the forum topic, or do you have nothing on your mind?

 
DmitriyN:

I don't like your idea of a survey. Please take a look at it.
 
Integer:
No, it isn't. Democracy does not require objectivity. Ahem)) so does a dictatorship.
But, is democracy better?
 
What's all the panic about? ) who got banned? ) who died? )
 
Somewhere on this forum I quoted a different codex - I can't find it. There was also a picture of a ninja with a katana. If you know it, please send me the link and let DmitriyN read it.
 
I don't see what the problem is and why vote. If you don't like the rules of the forum, there are other forums with less rigid rules. If I invite guests to my house, I make the rules of conduct in my house such as no swearing, no criticising me, no messing around in my walker, no treating other guests with respect, etc. If one of my guests doesn't like them, get out!
 
All the proposed candidates are more effective as piggy banks of knowledge, rather than burdening them with moderating activities. It is better to give forum members the opportunity to moderate their own threads, so that there will be less flooding and rudeness.
 
DmitriyN:
But, a better democracy?

A middle way is better.
12345678
New comment