from Bears

New comment
 

Someone does not like the work of the moderators. Suggesting in private to take part in moderator ranking. I suggest not getting involved in this bullshit.

The usual ways of contacting Roche or Renate to offend don't seem to work.

 
Uh-huh, someone is taking a lot on themselves.
[Deleted]  
Mischek2:

Someone does not like the work of the moderators. Suggesting in private to take part in moderator ranking. I suggest not getting involved in this bullshit.

The usual ways of contacting Roche or Renate to offend don't seem to work.

That's not true. I have a good relationship with all the moderators. Vote, it's your right. But, a big request, be honest and don't cheat the service. The moderators themselves, for the sake of purity of the experiment, please do not vote.
 

Unfortunately I couldn't vote, I couldn't find a suitable item - "All of those listed". I have not been banned yet, so all are good. So, whoever has made more bans during their time as a moderator is the more objective:)

[Deleted]  
What happened?
 
Are there moderators here too?
[Deleted]  
Their work should be appreciated (cherished and nurtured)
[Deleted]  
Votinglink (for those who didn't get one).
Link to view the results.
 

Paragraph 3.3 of the Rules.

What kind of questions could there be?

 
DmitriyN:
We'll keep that in mind for the future, sorry.

In addition, I find some things I would, if I got a ban for, I wouldn't mind at all. So, moderation is more than democratic. If someone here got a ban, that's a very serious sign.

But being democratic doesn't mean objectivity.

[Deleted]  
sever32:
What happened?
Why, what's going to happen? It's okay, don't worry.
12345678
New comment