Forget random quotes - page 59
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Double counter? .... So it's already a martin. And if you don't close the previous counter, you lock one. Did I get it right?
You should only time out if the signal is against the wool, or better still, roll over with a double counter.
The first I support, the second I deny.
Lisa, he's not a fourth, he's an IV.
About time - not as simple as Paukas, but much simpler :)
So, share. I'll find something to disagree with you.
Why do you say so at once? How can you confirm it?
By setting TP at random, we equalise it with SL. It's a necessary thing, but not profitable.
Any tactic of working with pattern implies a signal to enter when the moment of exit is not clear, hence - "dancing with tambourine", in the best case - Fibo expansion.
What kind of martin? You open a double counter position to an already open position and OrderCloseBy(), one remains in the opposite direction.
Shut it down, not by timeout, but by fuck.
What does it mean to fuck off? Is it to close the terminal and computer and go for a beer? (I read this advice from you somewhere)))
Setting TP at random
First of all, not at random. Secondly, I mean the timing, fuck the stops.
The souring time of the signal? :)