1. Congratulations!) Did you really manage to get the system state into submartingal?
2. If other - it is self-deception and shamanism)
1. thank you! :-)
I translate the system state into a stable, by means of netting variants of Martin (with anticipation by a quarter) by various schemes of increasing a traded volume (adding with flips - when it is moving + averaging - when it is flat) with a possibility to optimize (choose) this or that scheme at this or that timeframe of this or that instrument!
Ilano-Martin - rules!
2. I do not deal with such bullshit.
P.S. Google it (I think they wrote it myself - cool! :-) - I'll have a look) - "Levels localization from levels!" :-)
If the trader considers it to be extremely low, he/she is justified in investing his/her entire deposit, unlike the unsure of the outcome, who insures his/her ignorance with some % of the additional deposit, leaving the rest as ballast.
Translate the state of the system in a stable, through the netting variants of martin (with the anticipation of a five) on the various schemes to increase the traded volume (shares with flips - with traffic + averaging - a sideways) with the possibility of optimizing (choosing) this or that scheme at this or that timeframe of one or another instrument!
Ilano-Martin - rules!
2. I do not deal with such bullshit.
P.S. Google it (I think they wrote it myself - cool! :-) - I'll have a look) - "Leveling the loc from the levels!" :-)
I'll read it... though no, I won't.... my brain is allergic to loki))
Good luck in the championship! If it'll help, then Locke's here for you!)
DmitriyN: I'll tell you a secret. Makers manage locks :)
Dmitry Sergeevich, you must be confusing clearing with locks...and their functional differences.
In trading, lots will not give you any advantage. Either with or without them. This is just a little different system of accounting, if I may put it that way.
It's already written about it a hundred times on the Forum.
jelizavettka: G.d. is also everywhere. That doesn't mean we have to eat it.
I have a Labrador dog, still has them... ...bastard. I look at him and I think, you can't cheat nature. So it's only natural for the traders to eat them.
1. Congratulations!) Did you really manage to get the system state into submartingal?
2. If other - it is self-deception and shamanism)
1. thank you! :-)
I translate the system state into a stable, by means of netting variants of Martin (with anticipation by a quarter) by various schemes of increasing a traded volume (adding with flips - when it is moving + averaging - when it is flat) with a possibility to optimize (choose) this or that scheme at this or that timeframe of this or that instrument!
Ilano-Martin - rules!
2. I do not deal with such bullshit.
P.S. Google it (I think they wrote it myself - cool! :-) - I'll have a look) - "Levels localization from levels!" :-)
Curious.
A few words and/or figures, if possible.
It's about the risk involved.
If the trader considers it to be extremely low, he/she is justified in investing his/her entire deposit, unlike the unsure of the outcome, who insures his/her ignorance with some % of the additional deposit, leaving the rest as ballast.
1. thank you! :-)
Translate the state of the system in a stable, through the netting variants of martin (with the anticipation of a five) on the various schemes to increase the traded volume (shares with flips - with traffic + averaging - a sideways) with the possibility of optimizing (choosing) this or that scheme at this or that timeframe of one or another instrument!
Ilano-Martin - rules!
2. I do not deal with such bullshit.
P.S. Google it (I think they wrote it myself - cool! :-) - I'll have a look) - "Leveling the loc from the levels!" :-)
I'll read it... though no, I won't.... my brain is allergic to loki))
Good luck in the championship! If it'll help, then Locke's here for you!)
I'll read it... though no, I won't.... my brain is allergic to loki))
I'll tell you a secret. Makers manage locks :)
Dmitry Sergeevich, you must be confusing clearing with locks...and their functional differences.
In trading, lots will not give you any advantage. Either with or without them. This is just a little different system of accounting, if I may put it that way.
It's already written about it a hundred times on the Forum.
Loki - they're everywhere :))) A thought.
In trading, locks will not give any advantage.
G.d. is also everywhere. That doesn't mean we have to eat it.
I have a Labrador dog, still has them... ...bastard. I look at him and I think, you can't cheat nature. So it's only natural for the traders to eat them.