Optimal moving average - page 9

 
jelizavettka:
Thank you. Concise .

sarcasm ?)) or ...
 
Freud:

sarcasm ?)) or ...

No. From the heart. You gave a good answer to my question.

That's the author's definition. There can be no sarcasm.

 
Freud: _ как в твоем случае выбирать между инструментами, которым отдается предпочтение (на которых более вероятен в тот или иной момент положительный исход сделки).

You yourself gave a link to Prival's post. I quote: "Third. I'm looking for entry points into the market that give minimum risk. This applies to any normal system in general.
As for the choice of instruments - definitely the one with the highest value (volatility/spread size).

 
What are you guys talking about for nine pages?
Gentlemen of theorists and hunting from nothing to nothing?
And on the subject (Optimal Moving Average) do you have anything to write, just not abstract or theoretical ideas?
Something like I've been doing... I've been counting...
 

and what to say about it, the main thing is to set the optimality condition, and to describe relative to what this condition should adapt.

What is the OPTIMAL MA for? and at what interval.

 

OPTIMAL MA for what?
For trading, which is surprising?

and on what interval .

If 1000 traders are shown a chart with no scale and no name, not one will say what the name is and what the period is. This is the best proof that the name of the pair (stock) and the period are not important for successful trading.


And on the optimality condition, I will think about it.

 
panzernik:

OPTIMAL MA for what?
For trading, which is surprising?

So get your EA into a tester and search for the optimal MA.
 
panzernik:

OPTIMAL MA for what?
For trading, which is surprising?

and on which interval .

If 1000 traders are shown a chart with no scale and no name, not one will say what the name is and what the period is. This is the best proof that the name of the pair (stock) and the period are not important for successful trading.


And on the optimality condition, I will think about it.


I meant that your starting topic looks like this: you are shown child's drawings of the sea, some of them are blue, some are blue, some are darker blue, but not as blue as in the first case, and some are bluer than in the first case. You want the machine to think about it and pick it out for you. Just give it the ideal bluish colour in relation to which the machine will find the right choice.
 

Answer yourself a couple of riddles:

1. Do you have an algorithm for profitable trading based on these "Optimal MAs"?

2. And if you do, what is the mathematical problem of implementing them?

===
Honestly? You don't seem to quite get where the point is.

 
panzernik:

If 1000 traders are shown a chart with no scale and no name, not one will say what the name is and what the period is. This is the best proof that pair(stock) name and period are not important for successful trading.



This is proof that they are not important for a successful flop.