Negro! - page 60 1...535455565758596061626364656667...109 New comment moskitman 2012.04.18 11:35 #591 sanyooooook: and martin is a bit of a survivor.) it's only when you want it to fail, but when you want to make money on it, it fails fast... Alexandr Bryzgalov 2012.04.18 11:36 #592 I say he's a bastard.) moskitman 2012.04.18 11:37 #593 alexeymosc: I meant on average. There will definitely be more than one deal... I think so. an average of 2.5 deals (well, like a digger and a half) Alexandr Bryzgalov 2012.04.18 11:38 #594 What could be easier to drain 100 c.u., I've done it many times, but I can't fill or drain it properly, it's just powerlessness or something )) михаил потапыч 2012.04.18 11:44 #595 sanyooooook: martin is a hardy bastard ))) 1 . if you have an axe that exploits market inefficiencies, it makes absolutely no difference what to do, to pour or to dump tired of shedding, swap buy and sell, and you will honestly shed 2 . if there is no real ts, which exploits the market inefficiency, the ts will always be casual it will never fill up and lose the deposit with endless deposit and endless trading but if you add a spread, it will start to lose on the spread martin is nothing, it would improve or worsen the results of endless trading. 3. you should not be interested in one-time statistics on one-time losses you may have a random entry and exit at Take 1,000 or Stop 10 you don't have to worry about one time loss statistics. i will exit with a stop loss of 1000 or 10 Is risk diversification even Stable MTS Scalping. Tick chart on [Deleted] 2012.04.18 11:44 #596 It's all Micha, he's jinxed you )) or martin... or the terminal... moskitman 2012.04.18 11:47 #597 cardinal truths михаил потапыч 2012.04.18 11:49 #598 moskitman: cardinal truths First grade second quarter, that's what's scary. [Deleted] 2012.04.18 11:50 #599 Mischek2: 1 . if you have a tool that exploits market inefficiencies, it makes absolutely no difference whether you're filling up or emptying tired of pouring, swap buy and sell, and you will honestly lose 2 . if there is no real ts which exploits the inefficiency of the market, the ts will always be random it will never fill up and lose the deposit with endless deposit and endless trading but if you add a spread, it will start to lose on the spread martin is nothing, it would improve or worsen the results of endless trading. 3. you should not be interested in one-time statistics on one-time losses you may have a random entry and exit at Take 1,000 or Stop 10 the one-off probability of a stop is the same as the number of times you'll earn more when you finally get to your stop oh, for the first time in years Michael has said something about trading . михаил потапыч 2012.04.18 11:52 #600 sever31: oh, Mikhail said something about trading for the first time in years. it wasn't me, i'm not involved, i'm the editor of the wall newspaper 1...535455565758596061626364656667...109 New comment
and martin is a bit of a survivor.)
I meant on average. There will definitely be more than one deal... I think so.
martin is a hardy bastard )))
1 . if you have an axe that exploits market inefficiencies, it makes absolutely no difference what to do, to pour or to dump
tired of shedding, swap buy and sell, and you will honestly shed
2 . if there is no real ts, which exploits the market inefficiency, the ts will always be casual
it will never fill up and lose the deposit with endless deposit and endless trading
but if you add a spread, it will start to lose on the spread
martin is nothing, it would improve or worsen the results of endless trading.
3. you should not be interested in one-time statistics on one-time losses
you may have a random entry and exit at Take 1,000 or Stop 10
you don't have to worry about one time loss statistics. i will exit with a stop loss of 1000 or 10
It's all Micha, he's jinxed you )) or martin... or the terminal...
cardinal truths
First grade second quarter, that's what's scary.
1 . if you have a tool that exploits market inefficiencies, it makes absolutely no difference whether you're filling up or emptying
tired of pouring, swap buy and sell, and you will honestly lose
2 . if there is no real ts which exploits the inefficiency of the market, the ts will always be random
it will never fill up and lose the deposit with endless deposit and endless trading
but if you add a spread, it will start to lose on the spread
martin is nothing, it would improve or worsen the results of endless trading.
3. you should not be interested in one-time statistics on one-time losses
you may have a random entry and exit at Take 1,000 or Stop 10
the one-off probability of a stop is the same as the number of times you'll earn more when you finally get to your stop
oh, for the first time in years Michael has said something about trading .
oh, Mikhail said something about trading for the first time in years.
it wasn't me, i'm not involved, i'm the editor of the wall newspaper