You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
And anyway, these calculations are from somewhere, as if they fell from the moon. Some kind of min and max equity you're looking for. In general, so far, the theatre of the absurd).
People have already said how to calculate a normal drawdown as a percentage, but no, you have to bend your ways. Of course, you have to show that you are the smartest).
We are talking about the absolute value of the maximum drawdown, not the relative value. So percentages have nothing to do with it. I understand that you are in a mess and I don't see any point in clarifying things with you anymore.
That lying has already become your trademark? Not enough arguments, start lying?
And anyway, these calculations are from somewhere, as if they fell from the moon. You're looking for some kind of min and max equity. In general, so far, the theatre of the absurd).
People have already said how to calculate a normal drawdown as a percentage, but no, you have to bend your ways. Of course, you have to show that you are the smartest).
I knew it, I thought I'd fix it or not, it's more likely to be a joke, so it is) I left it there to make it funnier.)
Making fun of the elderly in a civilised society is not acceptable.
In this case, you are not just an old man, but you claim to be the ultimate truth. And irony is caused by your reasoning, sorry, but there is no other way to react) I'm off to the cradle, good night!)
I think you're just being stubborn. Stay with your opinion, it's up to you to make a mistake, not me)
If stubbornness speaks to me, you have a morbid ego. You are the one who thinks that KimIV's functions are half-finished. Which means that your functions are the best in the world. But KimIV functions have become classics and are used by a huge number of people, while no one has heard or seen anything about yours, which is the best in the world.
By the way, I was wondering what overstated I was talking about) You simply did not record the actual drawdown at all. That is, in other words, you simply refused to acknowledge it, calling it "rumour". Dak in general, what's the conversation about so far.
They tell you that Ilan is actually losing half of depo, and you do not believe them and say, "No, the tester shows everything correctly". So what is there to talk about with such an approach. Continue in the same spirit of blind nihilism, and hopefully the dept will go down faster and you'll realise that you were wrong.