[Archive] Learn how to make money villagers! - page 374

 
khorosh:

In my variant Ilan's condition if (PrevCl > CurrCl) is maintained and no inductors are used. At the same time, unlike the variant with OsM, it does not drain over the last 2 years. Test 2009.11.25 - 2012.01.01

Well, it's not bad. However, the profitability is also significantly lower, isn't it? It is always a double-edged sword: either risk and potential profit or one of two)

And the non-disposability in 2 years doesn't guarantee that it won't happen in a week.

About if (PrevCl > CurrCl) I still don't think it makes much sense on minutes. On higher halves maybe.

 
Mathemat:
Yuri, this is even embarrassing for me, but... please show me the basement where the statistical report parameters are.
I've posted it before.
 
OnGoing:

Well, that's not bad. However, the profitability is significantly lower, isn't it? It's always a double-edged sword, either risk and potential profit or one of the two)

And 2 years of insolvency doesn't guarantee that it won't happen in a week's time either.

++++++++++++++++++++
And as a result sooner or later (better sooner) you will come to what I wrote in the beginning: a deposit at 10-11% per annum with zero risk will be more profitable than any perversions with averaging.

 
OnGoing:

Well, that's not bad. However, the profitability is significantly lower, isn't it? It's always a double-edged sword, either risk and potential profit or one of the two)

And the non-disposability in 2 years doesn't guarantee that it won't happen in a week.

About if (PrevCl > CurrCl) I still don't think it makes much sense on minutes. On higher halves maybe.

Completely agree, in the condition if (PrevCl > CurrCl) I use hourly bars.
 
khorosh:
I completely agree, in the condition if (PrevCl > CurrCl) I use hourly bars.
I already wrote in Avalanche branch and here as well that variants of such EAs should be compared by profit value between losses. If an EA fails more often, it does not mean it is worse. We should compare profit between plumbs and losses at plumbs.
 
khorosh:
I wrote in Avalanche branch and here as well that variants of similar Expert Advisors should be compared by size of profit between drawdowns. If an Expert Advisor fails more often, it does not mean it is worse. We need to compare profits between failures.

Exactly. On the Osma version, if you last a month from an initial 100 c.u., you can ramp up to 20 times that, making yourself a decent deposit. And then work with it more seriously.

But in general, of course it would be better to protect against runback of 350 points that happened several times on the eurofound. Then it would be possible to work directly with the second variant.

 
4x-online:

You don't need an advisor for a 10% annual return. You can just put money in the bank. Advisors like this are used by people who like to get a thrill, like casino-goers.
 
OnGoing:

Exactly. On the Osma version, if you last a month from an initial 100 c.u., you can ramp up to 20 times that, making yourself a decent deposit. And then work with it more seriously.

But in general, of course it would be better to protect against runback of 350 points that happened several times on the eurofound. Then it would be possible to work directly on the second variant.

I am currently working on a variant that allows opening positions of the opposite direction if losses of a certain value are sustained in a flat trend. Only fillings (stop orders) are used. Positions are closed when the total position reaches a profit.
 
khorosh:
I am currently working on a variant where, if a loss of a certain amount is reached in a flat trend, then I am allowed to open positions in the opposite direction. Only fillings (stop orders) are used. Positions are closed when the total position reaches a profit.
I wanted to implement such a thing on a simple Ilan as well. Maybe it makes sense to do it this way, i.e. as a stop loss in case of force majeure. I wanted to start compensating immediately with the opposite grid of smaller volume.
 
Here, if you'd bolted on Osma, people would have said thank you.) Since you're doing it anyway)
Reason: