Econometrics: one step ahead forecast - page 110
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The regressions you construct are ideologically no different from NS: in fact they are the same [statistical] games with numbers with no intelligible internal content.
This is for you, not for me.
Tell us in popular language what this "probit model" is and why it is so good for econometricians. Just don't link to the wiki. Please tell us in your own language with examples.
I'll refrain for now. There is something I do not understand in it, since I cannot interpret the results.
Interest is understandable. In trend trading, reversals are important. We don't care about levels. Levels may be important in breakout strategies. I don't know I have never traded that way. I've picked ZZs with over 200 pips difference in reversals. I think I can take a third in a real trade.
Yeah, that's what I mean too. Where the MA changes direction, the regression model will not show this change, the accuracy of the model is a bit enough, I agree, but the direction of the MA change will still at first glance predict well, like 80% of hits, but still not enough for trading.
PS: since you're here, a word of advice - faa, don't fuck around, ZZs are not predicted - they are places where the price is practically non-existent, they are random, and completely random. No regression model is adequate for this case.
What's there to understand))) the probit is from the same regression framework... just the input is continuous data and the output (what to look for) is Boolean (0...1)... that's why it was invented... not only continuous but + with Boolean data can be input... this will improve the result in some cases...
the mathematician is right and so are the others... everything is roughly the same... if a simple network is described by a formula, you can run it through the same way and it won't be a black box... it's just too much work...
A third would be a supergral. A very good trader is one who takes at least 10%.
At the beginning of the topic I was predicting a level. There are prospects there, and then I wondered why the level? I distilled the level into TS and there again the question: enter or not to enter and it depends on the direction. I sat down and thought: what can I predict? I remembered the ZZ and broke through. But it is not the only one.
The breach itself is not what is shown in the pictures above. It is the probability of 1 and not 0. Or rather not the probability itself, but the threshold of probability cutoff (I have 0.5) that an independent variable will cross some value. I changed this threshold. Prediction picture does not change until cut-off 0.8, it does not work from above, what could it mean?
Mathematician is right about the networks and so are the others... all from the same line...
And it wasn't clear to me how many bars ahead the reversal is predicted. And trade modelling can be done in excel, with a strategy in mind beforehand. Sometimes useful facts come out.
And it wasn't clear to me how many bars ahead the reversal is predicted. And trade modelling can be done in excel, with a strategy in mind beforehand. Sometimes useful facts come out.
And it wasn't clear to me how many bars forward the reversal is predicted to be.