Divorce methods... - page 4

New comment
 

Forex is a scam

Big headline on the main trader-programmer forum of the country/world)

 
Tantrik:

I actually agree with you 100 percent. (The more so if he does not know what it is - a trend or a correction).

Actually on the subject: divorce: Forex is a divorce (if you talk about currency exchange it used to be before - "people's Forex"). Here is the EUR a year ago at 1.4 and now at 1.4, and what was there a year ago? - That's right speculation! (with a small correction - not speculation by the people, but speculation by the people).

That's a strange way of thinking. The yen was 115 five years ago and now it's 76. So what?
 
paukas:
Strange way of thinking. Yen was 115 five years ago and now it's 76. So what?
He's just pissed about something...
 
Tantrik:

No. The question is philosophical.... good luck! Bye-bye! (you have been placed in a "frame" in which you are)

here's the frank/yen drawdown (you could justify 2 interventions) will the account come out of the drawdown?

So why on earth would they put him there?

That's Buffett here can afford it. There are no Buffets here.

 
Cmu4:
He's just offended by something...
That's for sure. Probably because he's outliving his losses. It's all the fault of that lousy tailwind, he's sitting on his losses.)
 
paukas:

So why the hell would they put him there?

Buffett is the one who can afford it. There's no Buffett here.

Not only will you not be able to get the account out of a drawdown, you won't be able to get in. (The account will be taken out in profit! - in any case!)
 
paukas:

Well, why the fuck would you put him there?

Buffett is the one who can afford it. There's no Buffett here.

There's a lot of spiders

who don't see a momentary lock when taking a take profit, supposedly...

but they're beating themselves up over the fact that lock is "not kosher".

Close on the market, my dear.

And if business follows your words.

then we'll listen.

;)

т

 
Tantrik:
...the account will be taken out to profit! - in any case!
Probably with the same words a UBS trader recently lost 2 billion quid )
 
Meat:
Probably with the same words a UBS trader recently lost 2 billion quid )
I think he was thinking of himself.
 
Meat:
Probably with the same words a trader from UBS recently dumped 2 billion quid )

Do you believe this nonsense?

There are concepts - limit per trader. limit per position (asset).

it's been around for 10 years in the cis.

there's already a BAZEL III.

i think it's just another arrowhead like Fuchs.

12345678910
New comment