You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
unlikely ... You can't use them directly (volumes) on forex.
Yes, it's been tested - you can. I've written about it myself more than once here on the forum. With understandable limitations.
If you use MA on volume and ATR, there will be almost no difference. Ergo- ))) is pretty objective.
Yes, it's been tested - you can. I've written about it myself more than once here on the forum. With understandable limitations.
And so, if you take out MA by volume and ATR, there's almost no difference. Ergo- ))) is pretty objective.
The difference between what?
What, has the sign generator gone off? Has the UTF gone haywire?
What, has the sign generator gone off? Has the UTF gone haywire?
MA by volume on fore?
No, I'm not disputing the statement, I just don't understand why we need it.
Thetick volumes, although correlated, show a different picture than the real ones.
Yeah. So? It's easy to check. My records in Base have a volatility indulger where you can put volume as an argument.
No, I'm not disputing the statement, I just don't understand why we need it.
The tick volumes, although correlated, show a different picture than the real ones.